69% (23)
30% (10)You are asked to kill someone and are given diplomatic immunity. You are given a suit that makes you impervious to harm. You have a choice, sneak up behind them with a knife, or run head on at them waving like a mad man with an RPG, which would you go for?
Personally, an RPG would be my choice...as much as I do love to sneak about in the shadows, I can't pass up the chance to fire an RPG at something close range and fly across the sky unharmed xP
ID:67430
 May 3 2009, 4:07 am
|
|
Vexonater wrote:
While the RPG is obviously the more visual way to go, it also causes unnecessary collateral damage to the surrounding area. Just because a diplomat or spy needs to die doesn't mean you have to cause thousands of dollars of repair damage to the hotel/inn/office he happens to be in. I got that idea from ONE game, ONE xP | |
I would say that the RPG is the less civilized way to go. I would rather use the knife just for its ease and far less mess. If you are a complete barbarian, or just want to have some fun, sure, use the RPG. Personally, I would hope that this person I am asked to kill has some reason to be killed. I can easily tell everyone that I would go around mass murdering people with the RPG like in Grand Theft Auto or something, but really I don't know if I would have it in me to actually kill someone.
| |
Hmm, if I can't be harmed. I'd dive off large buildings attempting to crush my target through careful planning.
| |
That's a good one. I would enjoy doing that.
| |
If I had to kill someone, I wouldn't want to actually watch them die slowly. Just one blast and there's nothing left of them. No need to watch.
| |
Also, play fewer videogames.