The Magic Man:

as for the figures I named - those are not just imaginary. Time for references I suppose...

Optometrist salary
family Physician
game programmer -- this is actually less that what my company pays


Although these may vary from company to company - I did not just pull figures out of my arse ;) I've been involved in this industry for years. A great example of Salary variations - an artist at gameloft would be getting paid around 40k compared to 70k at a place such as Glu mobile.

-Dan

PS. I will agree that image would not be worth $500

PPS. Looking at the numbers again - that image was never meant to be 500. it was meant to be 500 for 3 images, correct? so that one image alone would be $166? More reasonable, but it still looks unfinished.
Wow @ Indigos 1st post. *Cough*Rape*Cough*.

Magic Man's bullshit:
Maybe I misunderstood it, but what you just said it basically you can be "godlike" at programming within a year and the same with pixel art. And because of this I am a fool?

And I can't believe you called Indigo a scam artist (the ideal pixel artist -_-, seriously if there was a "role model" award for pixel artists it would be given to him), you must be out of your fruity mind. Have you seen his work? -_- He's like a demon, it's the people like him that rape even the GBA artists or wherever your friend works. (P.S. he is a professional).

If you ask me, pixel art is easy actually. I'm not particularly fond of it, but given a year I know I could be better than http://www.pixeljoint.com/pixelart/29178.htm that guy. But pixel art is dull, and I do not like it.

No, are you dyslexic...? Reread it. Some people are gifted and can be good within a year. Magic, notice the yellow highlight in "Fool". It's the artists name, I wasn't calling you a Fool but obviously given the circumstances I won't deny the fact.

I mean, you just said with your own mouth "I could make something like Fools piece within a year". Which just honestly makes you look retarded. Given the fact that you don't even understand art. You couldn't even touch me with a decades worth of practice nevermind Fool or Indigo.

I don't know why you talk about things you don't understand. You don't see anything when you look at art because you weren't born an artist. And even if you did try it out, your judgement is so terrible(it's very "altered" to put it nicely) it would reflect in your work. And man I wouldn't mess around like that, I'm dead serious.

Look at these messages I'm getting. Please just stop for the sake of the Byond community. -_-

http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/8981/picture18xl1.png
The Magic Man,

Proposition for you...

If you are up for it I will pay you $20 to complete those 70 frames of animation you spoke of within 2 hours. and I will time you.

It's not much in terms of industry standard, but since you have no prior experience and you say you can do this in 2 hours - this is quite the deal. $10/hr. (payable via paypal, of course)

And that is 6 frames of run animation per direction on an isometric grid (up, up-left, left, down-left, and down. Flips not necessary) plus an idle frame for each direction - for both a male and female character. 26x40 pixels, 8 colors. (female should be more feminine run cycle) Equating to 70 frames - submitted in an animation strip in 8-bit indexed-color png format. First index must be transparent magenta rgb(255,0,255)

I will tell you one last specification before you officially start as to make sure you don't jump the gun.

Up for some extra cash?
Im pretty sure getting feedback from someone who is currently active in the industry means game over for anyone saying anything different on this matter.

Magic Man, you strike me as incredibly arrogant and whiney at this point. For Christs sake, you use RPG maker turf for Generiquest.

As its been said before, its true that 500 dollars being charged for that image is much too high.

Calypson, nice to see you over here on BYOND, I always appreciate seeing someone in the industry posting based on thier experience. I myself am majoring in game design, as id like to be a technical artist.

Hulio-G wrote:
No, are you dyslexic...? Reread it. Some people are gifted and can be good within a year. Magic, notice the yellow highlight in "Fool". It's the artists name, I wasn't calling you a Fool but obviously given the circumstances I won't deny the fact.

It's not that I am dyslexic, it is that your English in that sentance was just plain bad.

I mean, you just said with your own mouth "I could make something like Fools piece within a year". Which just honestly makes you look retarded. Given the fact that you don't even understand art. You couldn't even touch me with a decades worth of practice nevermind Fool or Indigo.

Who doesn't understand art :[? Did you become some kind of psychic that can read my mind.
Just so you know, I DO know about art. Maybe not computer art, but I was taught a lot of things that would translate easily into computer art.
Haha, when I was young I use to be into art and drawing a lot. And by the time I was 15 had done and aced a 2 year college course in fine arts. But it was around this time I realised that drawing cool looking robots and monsters wasn't all that fun anymore.

I don't know why you talk about things you don't understand. You don't see anything when you look at art because you weren't born an artist. And even if you did try it out, your judgement is so terrible(it's very "altered" to put it nicely) it would reflect in your work. And man I wouldn't mess around like that, I'm dead serious.

If anything I was born an artist. But you're right! I never really understood artists at all, I mean, now-a-days you can call anything art.
Slap some paint randomly on a canvas, hi guys like my ART??
Even taking a piss on stage is now considered art.
Then again, I am no psychologist, and wouldn't understand all these artists, who all seem to share the same sort of superiority complex.
Calypson wrote:
The Magic Man,

Proposition for you...

If you are up for it I will pay you $20 to complete those 70 frames of animation you spoke of within 2 hours. and I will time you.

It's not much in terms of industry standard, but since you have no prior experience and you say you can do this in 2 hours - this is quite the deal. $10/hr. (payable via paypal, of course)

And that is 6 frames of run animation per direction on an isometric grid (up, up-left, left, down-left, and down. Flips not necessary) plus an idle frame for each direction - for both a male and female character. 26x40 pixels, 8 colors. (female should be more feminine run cycle) Equating to 70 frames - submitted in an animation strip in 8-bit indexed-color png format. First index must be transparent magenta rgb(255,0,255)

I will tell you one last specification before you officially start as to make sure you don't jump the gun.

Up for some extra cash?

I'll make you a deal since as you said, I have no prior experience. $300 and you've got a deal. (If an artist can charge outrageous prices, I figure I can too)

Though :[ I have to say you are making things unfair.
I said a 32x32 sprite, and it was to be used as a template, which means colour is not needed.
Also, since I am not some fancy pants artist, and the format you are asking for is not something I should be expected to know. Nor do I have any art software outside of MS Paint, which I am pretty sure cannot do transparent PNGs, and I am not going to pay for any software like this either. So a free alternative which can do this would be nice!

But yeah, provided everything above is provided I could romp through a request like that in 2 hours.
1) requesting $150/hr is contradictory to your very own post here and is an outrageous price even compared to those you mock. There is no way in hell I will pay an inexperienced individual 600% more than a seasoned professional. You're making yourself look silly now.

2) 32x32 and 26x40 are virtually the same size give or take a few pixels. Do the math

3) A base sprite is rendered just as much as any other sprite, just without clothing. This is what I was originally quoting for, and I expect you to do the same.

4) Part of an artist being paid as much as he does is because of the knowlege BEHIND the art as well as the piece itself. This includes things such as formats, technical jargon, and having invested in tools to create such art

You sir are a hypocrite if you do not accept my $20 offer, but hell... I'll offer you $30 ($15/hr) just to make you smile a bit more. (I started my career at $15/hr)

-Dan
The Magic Man wrote:
Then again, I am no psychologist, and wouldn't understand all these artists, who all seem to share the same sort of superiority complex.

Wow, the irony...? Have you seen the developer boards? It's a constant battle for intelligence among programmers trying to prove how awesome they are. I'm starting to feel your age is responsible for the lack of thought put into your posts.

It's not that I am dyslexic, it is that your English in that sentance was just plain bad.

Translation with dummy assistance:
"Programing is NOT pixel art. UNlike in programming you could start on your first year and be Godlike."...Notice the UN, it wouldn't be there if what you said was true.

"Look at this guy Fool (WITH the yellow Link -_-), He was among the top pixel artists over at PJ even on his first year"...You really think I'm talking in 3rd third person? Really, unless you're a top artist I think you shall understand. -_-

Firstly, don't blame my English for your lack of comprehension skills.

Secondly, there's obviously more to art then what you know (or are capable of knowing given your narrow mindset), and it's that kind of ignorance that is to blame for why I believe you will stay stagnant in ability.

You've just admitted you're clueless when it comes to the art world (dude doesn't even accept color fonts on his blog). Infact you're about as far from an artist as you can get. You don't understand those artists because we see the world differently from you. And no I didn't use my "psychic" powers, I used simple reasoning skills. You don't understand art.

And if you think you do...Well then, prove it and take Indigos challenge. Until then like Amon said, it's bullshit.
Hulio-G wrote:
Wow, the irony...? Have you seen the developer boards? It's a constant battle for intelligence among programmers trying to prove how awesome they are. I'm starting to feel your age is responsible for the lack of thought put into your posts.

And that is any worse that artists how?


Translation with dummy assistance:
"Programing is NOT pixel art. UNlike in programming you could start on your first year and be Godlike."...Notice the UN, it wouldn't be there if what you said was true.

"Look at this guy Fool (WITH the yellow Link -_-), He was among the top pixel artists over at PJ even on his first year"...You really think I'm talking in 3rd third person? Really, unless you're a top artist I think you shall understand. -_-

Like I said, BAD ENGLISH.
"Look at this guy Fool" could easily be mistaken for "look at this guy, you fool".


Secondly, there's obviously more to art then what you know (or are capable of knowing given your narrow mindset), and it's that kind of ignorance that is to blame for why I believe you will stay stagnant in ability.

You artists have just as narrow a mindset as I do. I don't think art is worth as much as you artists think it is. What exactly is the difference in our mindset other than price? What makes your mindset less narrow and ignorant than mine? The fact that you are an ARTIST? (Superiority complex again, hahaha)

Also, how is my narrow mindset going to make my skill stagnant... Actually which skills?
My art skills? Damn right, if I wanted to be an artist I'd draw. I don't even own a pencil, which says just how much I am bothered about my art skills.
My programming/game making skills? Don't much care about them either. They are a hobby, nothing more. But even then, how would you know whether they are improving or not (which by the way they are, all the time at that).

You've just admitted you're clueless when it comes to the art world (dude doesn't even accept color fonts on his blog). Infact you're about as far from an artist as you can get. You don't understand those artists because we see the world differently from you. And no I didn't use my "psychic" powers, I used simple reasoning skills. You don't understand art.

So... Because my blog doesn't use a fancy colour scheme I don't know anything about art? Makes sense if you ask me.
And, superiority complex again! How exactly does an artist see the world diferently from other people? Is your vision of the world FANTASTICAL or something like that? Sure you aint been tripping on drugs or something. Because I am pretty sure you see the world in the exact same way as I do.

And if you think you do...Well then, prove it and take Indigos challenge. Until then like Amon said, it's bullshit.

Provided he accepts my terms then I said, I will accept the challenge.
It is possible to make a 70-frame icon with 8 dir in less than 10 minutes... though just not a very good one ;D (Edit: and by this, I mean a really crappy one)

Example: a blob moving side to side (left to right and vice-versa) by one pixel.

(The reason why it can be done through < 10 minutes is by having one state done (or eight, one for each dir), make DM create a new instance, shift it, add to a main icon file, repeat until 70 frames are done).

My decapitation scene (for Dead Man Walking) was done using the above, though because it required more detail (blood dripping, head falling appropriately) and learning how to do the above trick), it took at least 1 hr... meh, there I go babbling off again.

Though 70 frames of good animation... well, I would be surprised if someone can do a really good job in two hours. I am sure it is possible, just not fun.
You can't get a song composed for $20. I've been waiting 6 years for a composer for Incursion. Music composition of any quality tends to run in at least the $200 range from my understanding, but composers online have tended to be busy individuals anyway. Lack of appropriate music has been an ongoing frustration for me in my projects.

For basic icon artistry though, I agree $500 is a severe overreach. The skill is much easier to pick up, and more widespread. $500 is closer to what you'd expect to pay for logo design by a professional (albeit low-end) graphics design house. For basic pixel art or Photoshopping it just doesn't make sense.

Calypson seems to come across as fairly intelligent but I think he's misjudging this market. Also, his pricing and idea of income levels appears to be based on a relatively high cost of living. Where I am, $50-70K/yr. is excellent money.
The Magic Man wrote:
And that is any worse that artists how?

Thats the point of my reply. You don't see me originally going "Oh programmers think they know everything". When there are people in other professions that do the same thing. You fail at generalizations mainly because you speak recklessly and say anything if you think it'll prove a point.

Like I said, BAD ENGLISH.
"Look at this guy Fool" could easily be mistaken for "look at this guy, you fool".

Bad English? More irony. Just because the name may be misleading is no reason to be ignorant. Considering you can easily spot out half a dozen hints in there you need to strengthen your own literature skills.

If "Look at this guy Magic, he was among the top..." Makes sense. Then how doesn't the substitution of "Fools" name?? For christ sake the F was in caps! and freaken cloaked in yellow html. And you obviously clicked the link so you should have seen AUTHER:"FOOL". Wow, "I'm a 15 year old who cannot be wrong part two?". I love how you're criticizing people who have better literary skills then even your own when most of the time you're sitting here typing in poetry rather then constructing normal paragraphs.

You artists have just as narrow a mindset as I do. I don't think art is worth as much as you artists think it is. What exactly is the difference in our mindset other than price? What makes your mindset less narrow and ignorant than mine? The fact that you are an ARTIST? (Superiority complex again, hahaha)

You can't conclude all artists are as narrow as you are because right now you don't see any talking about things they don't even understand going "oh, programming is pointless". I won't insult programmers by generalizing them with someone as insignificant as you. Especially since most programmers are usually intellectual individuals who understand money and value when it comes to game development.

Also, how is my narrow mindset going to make my skill stagnant... Actually which skills?
My art skills? Damn right, if I wanted to be an artist I'd draw. I don't even own a pencil, which says just how much I am bothered about my art skills.
My programming/game making skills? Don't much care about them either. They are a hobby, nothing more. But even then, how would you know whether they are improving or not (which by the way they are, all the time at that).

Are you delusional? You're the one claiming you have any art skills. Of course you don't have any. How can I tell? That "narrow mindset". In one post you're saying you don't care about art, another post you're saying you could be the best, you post with that "woulda, coulda, shoulda" crap. The world doesn't work like that, just because you pick up a pencil doesn't mean all of a sudden you'll be a good artist. What good is your own opinion when everyone else is saying you suck? When I teach beginners they always go "Wow, I didn't know there was so much more to art"...Prior, they knew little. But you right now? You don't know or see a damn thing (more like you refuse too). Your mentality would be an enormous handicap which is why I conclude you would struggle as an artist. I didn't ask about your programming/game making skills and given your reasoning skills I wouldn't care; Art is the focal point.

So... Because my blog doesn't use a fancy colour scheme I don't know anything about art? Makes sense if you ask me.
And, superiority complex again! How exactly does an artist see the world diferently from other people? Is your vision of the world FANTASTICAL or something like that? Sure you aint been tripping on drugs or something. Because I am pretty sure you see the world in the exact same way as I do.

(No, not the color scheme of your blog, I'm stating you disallow people use to use font colors which would make large posts like this easier to read.) Superiority complex? Don't jump into things you don't know about then start crying when people who do these kind of things on daily basis are making you look retarded. You don't see me telling Fizz he has a superiority complex just because he's letting people know what programming really is. Many people do things because they find beauty in them that other people wouldn't understand. I remember Vermolius(Programmer) showed me a code strip and told me that is what he found beauty in but you don't see me trying to ridicule something I don't understand.

The renewed artists observation skills are more intensified then the average person. Ex. You see a calender at the wall and it's a sunny day, the curtains are open. An artist is noticing how the shine reflects off any even "slightly" bent angles on the pager and how the light is hitting that calender to make it look like a calender(same thing goes for living things like human anatomy). They observe the shadows that are being cast off (and from what angle). They appreciate the smooth texture and watch how the colors are manipulated by this new condition.

Now to you, it's just a calendar. You can claim you notice all this shit (without even thinking about it) whenever you look at a calendar, a laptop or anything. But obviously that too would be bullshit considering you don't see much when you look at art. Actually, the average person probably sees alot more then you; Art isn't dull, just your personality.

P.S. Its obviously you who has the inferiority complex.
Hulio-G wrote:

I'll insult you, which obviously proves how wrong you are! Stupid!
Also, because shiney things look pretty to me, I see the world in a more fanciful way that you and am clearly superior!!

I sumerized everything you wrote.
I'd reply to what you wrote, but I really can't be bothered. Hahaha. You are also really kind of annoying you know?


You can't get a song composed for $20. I've been waiting 6 years for a composer for Incursion. Music composition of any quality tends to run in at least the $200 range from my understanding, but composers online have tended to be busy individuals anyway. Lack of appropriate music has been an ongoing frustration for me in my projects.

Depends on the quality you're looking for exactly.
From my experience, musicians seem to be much more reasonable and level headed people than artists, and for amateur quality music $20 for a song isn't unreasonable. It is not uncommon to see them offering their services for free either.
Sure, it is not professional quality music that they are making. But you're not paying for a professional, which makes it a reasonable deal if you ask me!
The Magic Man wrote:
I sumerized everything you wrote.
I'd reply to what you wrote, but I really can't be bothered. Hahaha. You are also really kind of annoying you know?

Speaking of bad English, it's summarized*. Even kids know It's a pain in the ass to counter logic with bullshit, you can only think of so much. The most annoying thing in the world is people thinking they could actually amount to something in other peoples realm(in this case art) that most people in there would find difficult. You basically said what we do is easy and that you're better then all of us when you don't know crap and have done crap. It's one thing to post with enthusiasm towards artists but after you said those lines you deserved every insult thats thrown at you.

As far as I'm concerned I shouldn't have bothered with that explanation. You're far too dense to understand the phrase "artist's see the world differently". And if you think being "different" means they are doing something better then you, then thats your problem; see inferiority complex. Considering the ignorance of the creator I don't think this blog post is even worth any of these peoples time.
Hulio-G wrote:

Speaking of bad English, it's summarized*. Even kids know It's a pain in the ass to counter logic with bullshit, you can only think of so much. The most annoying thing in the world is people thinking they could actually amount to something in other peoples realm(in this case art) that most people in there would find difficult. You basically said what we do is easy and that you're better then all of us when you don't know crap and have done crap. It's one thing to post with enthusiasm towards artists but after you said those lines you deserved every insult thats thrown at you.

Blah blah. I don't particularly remember saying art was easy. What I said was it's not as hard as you make it out to be, nor is it worth paying so much money for either.

Also, stop acting like you some how know me.
How do you know exactly how good or bad I am as an artist? Have you ever seen anything I've drawn? Doubt it, because I don't remember showing anyone on BYOND.
I can draw, and understand a lot of the theory behind it. I'll admit, I'm not the best artist in the world, but I'm not particularly bad either.
I have quiet a sloppy style to tell you the truth, but that is due to me being impatient and not having any desire to do things seriously.
My old computer is filled with hundreds of drawings that I did over the years, just because I was bored and had nothing better to do at the time.
If I wasn't hosting a game with people playing I'd go and set up my old computer, and show you some of the pictures, maybe that'd shut you up.

Also, watch your language. It is against the rules to swear on BYOND, and I don't feel like tolerating people doing it here either.

As far as I'm concerned I shouldn't have bothered with that explanation. You're far too dense to understand the phrase "artist's see the world differently". And if you think being "different" means they are doing something better then you, then thats your problem; see inferiority complex.

Nope, you've pretty much implied every single time that artists are different, and that somehow makes them superior.
"The renewed artists observation skills are more intensified then the average person."
How could that possibly mistaken for anything other than artists see things in a better way that other people?

Like I said, you have some sort of superiority complex. You're not saying you see things differently, you're saying you see them differently and in a better way.
I am really not interested in the flame war here, so I've been trying to keep my posts to the point.

The offer I made The Magic Man (which he seems to have declined) was not a genuine request for a service obviously, though I would have paid it. It was more to make a point about the time required to make a quality piece of artwork and the things that go on behind it. -A sort of 'put your money where your mouth is' type of example. Even he would not accept his "reasonable" price range. I think he realized that it would take much longer than 2 hours to accomplish - otherwise he would have easily accepted the offer of $15/hr.

The point I want to make is Professional Artists charge what they do because people pay it, and it's worth the cost. Simple as that. The open market has a way for balancing these types of things. Just in the same way you could hire a not-so-great musician for some music, you can also get a not-so-great artist. Just look around the art forums, and you'll find some willing souls.

on the extreme example, Sean Beeson charges roughly $800 per minute of song. He is a very high quality composer, and can charge much higher prices - just as a seasoned pixel artist might do.

Here is an interesting read about pixel art pricing - discussing the same issue we are now...
pixelartist salary


Lummox JR:
I find it hard to misjudge the industry I am currently in. The salary links i provided are national averages - not based on an area of high cost of living (though I will admit, all art jobs i've had thus far have been in such areas; NYC and SF). I will admit that my programmer estimations may have been inflated due to the company I'm currently in and me never having been paid for programming.

Anyway, I've given my input, and a lot of it seems to be ignored by the poster, but I'll leave it at that.

-Dan
Calypson wrote:
The point I want to make is Professional Artists charge what they do because people pay it, and it's worth the cost. Simple as that. The open market has a way for balancing these types of things. Just in the same way you could hire a not-so-great musician for some music, you can also get a not-so-great artist. Just look around the art forums, and you'll find some willing souls.

The whole point of the original post was this. I was not hiring a professional artist, I was hiring some kid who draws in his spare time.
Despite this they insisted that I pay them a price that is comparable to what I might pay a professional.
This is also not a one off either. It has so far happened with every artist I have tried to hire (2 pixel artists, 3 for a title screen/logo/avatar).

This however only seems to happen as far as graphical art is concerned. If I attempt to hire someone of similar skill level in another area of art, such as music I get a figure which is only a fraction of what these artists are trying to charge me.
It doesn't help when you have artists posting things along the lines of "totally worth it, throw even more money at him, since he is an artist".

Just what makes an artist think they can charge such expensive prices for work, when someone of similar skill level in another field is charging a fraction of the price they are, for roughly the similar sort of work, of a similar level of quality?
The Magic Man wrote:
Blah blah. I don't particularly remember saying art was easy. What I said was it's not as hard as you make it out to be, nor is it worth paying so much money for either.

Right, like over here. http://img389.imageshack.us/img389/3213/picture17es9.png

Also, stop acting like you some how know me. 
How do you know exactly how good or bad I am as an artist? ...{insert lame life story} I'd go and set up my old computer, and show you some of the pictures, maybe that'd shut you up.

I never said I knew you, but I obviously know artists. Anyone who has sounded as brainless as you towards the subject wouldn't have a clue. Hence the quote, "Your mentality would be an enormous handicap which is why I conclude you would struggle as an artist." Also, I really don't care about your life story and if you wanted prove anything you would have accepted the challenge.

Nope, you've pretty much implied every single time that artists are different, and that somehow makes them superior.

I merely implied they look into things more. Artists are observers and "see-ers" if I should put it simple.

How could that possibly mistaken for anything other than artists see things in a better way that other people?


Easy, by taking the time to read the question and understand these people instead of reading it like a child looking to get offended by everything. If I meant "better" I would have used that word. And drop the superiority complex routine, you've said it atleast 6 times in this thread, only someone with the inverse disease would do that.

It's not just the labor. It's the duration of the work as well. I imagine that charging more up front doing work-for-hires could allow an artist to ignore royalty disputes later.
Page: 1 2 3