Wow your the idiot in this reveiw, because i never said that YOU said he should. and About the runescape thing. Yes, you probably would because I do play it. 60% of the player base of the game are idiots. and I played the game on a different key, and i saw no point in playing after an hour.

Dragon783 wrote:

The last few reasons are TRUE for ANY game BYOND usually. These are free games man, you can't expect godly stuff, but wtf do you think this is? Anime does NOT include dungeons, as far as I know only Medieval RPGs.

Go to anywhere that is not the anime section of BYOND. You will find plenty of games with no punching bags and which remain fun and fresh for long after 5, 10 even 20 hours. It would have been more correct for you to say "those are true for any BYOND anime game".

As for anime games and dungeons... Why not?
If you people even bothered going a bit into depth on these anime series you'd find a lot of good areas that could be used as dungeons.

If you are a good guy there is Hueco Mundo, home of Hollows, a low level dungeon.
Las Noches, has a ton of different areas. The Privaron Espada areas could make up medium level dungeons (with the Espada as an end boss).
The Espada each have their own areas in Las Noches, each with their own Numeros as monsters and again, the Espada could be end bosses. These would be high level dungeons.
If you go by the filler episodes there is that layer under Hueco Mundo (Forest of Menos) where all sorts of Menos Grande and Adjudchas live, a medium low level dungeon.
And it is mentioned that Vasto Lorde are very powerful and also live in Las Noches, now you've got a dungeon for very high level people.
Lets see, Hueco Mundeo, Forest of Munos, 3 Privaron Espada dungeons, 10 Espada dungeons, 1 Vasto Lorde and 1 for Aizen.
In 2 minutes I thought up of a possible 17 dungeons that could be included in a game, are all valid and exist in the anime and would all work (for a good guy, a badguy would have each section of soul society, Rukogai the outer rim, with that big gate keeper as a boss to get into Seireitei, where you confront 13 dungeons with the captains as bosses and sub captains/other members as minibosses).

It's not that an anime game can't have these sort of things, it is just that none of you people are even bothered to put the effort into thinking about it. Because in 3 minutes I just planned out a Bleach game that is better than yours will ever be.

SadoSoldier wrote:

LMFAO you gotta be crazy for that to be true! tell me.. if you are a serious gamer like me.. whats the first thing they make u do on any game for any system?... 1)tutorials 2) a bunch of instructions and stuff so if you based it on that, then you have never played 2 seconds of any game

PS: if you say tutorials or instructions are fun im going to kill u

Unless the game is complex, like Dwarf Fortress or a Roguelike there is generally very little need to read instructions or even for a tutorial.
Additionally, tutorials, when done SMARTLY can be intergated into the game and except for short descriptions of what is happening and how to do things are no different from playing the normal game, thus they should be just as fun.

Itsaku
I didn't say he shouldn't enjoy it from the beginning you ignorant fuck, I said you should wait more than that amount of time to review it. He played for half an hour. If you logged on to Runescape for half an hour, would you be able to say you have an accurate view of the players? No, you would not. It's the same principle here, simply taken to a smaller scale. So please, take your "Shouldnt a person enjoy the game the "second" they play it?" theory and go elsewhere. I never said he shouldn't, I said it wasn't enough to REVIEW it.

BAWWWW about it some more. You don't have to play a game for 10 hours just to see a little sprite animation or hear a sound effect to know what the game looks, sounds and plays like.
As soon as I log in I can judge the graphics (or do they magically get better if I play for hours and hours? And if they do then they are bad for being inconsistant).
If I don't hear sound after 30 minutes of playing then there is an obvious lack of it, which is bad.
And I can play a game for 5 minutes (provided I am actually playing) to judge what sort of gameplay it has. I don't need to play for hours and get a "bankai" button to be able to judge that.
And provided I log in at a time where there is an average amount of a random assortment of players online I can get a good idea of what the community is like in minutes. You can't say "you don't know how nice and smart our community really is because you never played long enough to see it", when I log on and see people swearing abuse and acting like retards during my entire time playing. If that happens your community is more than likely full of idiots and not a good one.

Anyway, point remains. Whether this game is played for 10 minutes or 10 hours a review is still valid because the game doesn't have anything extra to offer after those 10 minutes (and no "you didn't get to level 20" or "you never got this skill" isn't a valid reply, something like "you only saw the introduction of the 30 hour long storyline, you never even met the bad guys!" is more of a valid answer).

Itsaku wrote:

Please my friend, there is no need to make a hipocryte. "and how does using made up words like fucktard help?" "Se the Flaw in that," Umm could you explain to me the word Se? I'd be interested to know. And the point isn't that I disagree with his opinion, he's entitled to that, and I will respect his right to have it. However he does not have the right to write a negative review for the game that everyone can see, after playing for half an hour. A "review" should be done by someone with sufficient experience to have seen at LEAST the majority of what he/she is reviewing. Did he see the majority of players in a half hour? Nope. Did he see half the SKILLS in a half hour? Nope. Did he even stick around to find out half of what he wrote his review on? No. MAYBE he saw the majority of the staff, but I somehow doubt it, unless he was on during a peak. He claimed it had no added graphics or sound, which is fact (actually it's fiction but he was passing it off as fact), not his opinion. Now please, before you go off and spout off your stupidity, please, READ the review and the comments.

Oh i read reveiws and comments. I'll take your advice and play it again but for 60minutes, and i'll write a reveiw of how it was for me

You don't need to see every little detail of a game to give it a valid review. You only need to see the core of what the game is to do that.

Tell me, when you buy clothes. Do you look at them, maybe wear them and then decide whether to buy them or not?
Because you seem like the sort of person who would look at them, closely inspect them, get out a magnifying glass and inspect the stitching, then inspect the materials weave, then how dense the material is and measure out exactly how much of it there is. Then you'd try it on, maybe walk around in it, do some exercise and imitate your daily life just to make sure it feel right. Then you'd decide on buying it or not.

But wait! You don't NEED to do that, you look at it, try it on and then decide. Because that is all that is needed.
It is the same here, I don't need to see or play as every character and get this hidden skill to judge the game. A quick 30 minute play doing what any other player would do is more than enough to judge the game by.

Itsaku wrote:

No. I would do just as you said, I would look at them, maybe wear them, then decide to buy them. However, I would NOT write a review on the clothing after doing that, I would at least wear them for a few days, which this person did not do.

You sure do throw out insults a lot in your previous posts here. Be civilized will you?

Anyway, its his right to make a review on a game, and as he and magic man have been saying, you don't have to see everything in the game to write a review on it.

He tried the gameplay (which is the biggest part of any game)

You tell me, besides the binding kido, do any of the abilities have special effects, poison, lower defense, etc. or do they all just do damage. If its the latter, you've proved my point. There is no difference in an attack if they all do the same thing.

That, plus ripped artwork mean you don't have to see everything in that one game, as its very likely the same things are in another rip with the same source.

SadoSoldier wrote:

Goku, very likely doesnt mean exactly.

Who said it did?


Your game has the same things the others do. Adding one or two attacks (that do the same thing anyway) doesnt make it unique.

Itsaku wrote:

Goku you're entirely missing my point. My point is that he played it for a half hour then felt he knew the pbase and staff well enough to review them. The other parts only came up after people like Magicman and Komaru Uchiha continuously said the same thing: That it's a matter of opinion. I never said it was not a matter of opinion. I never said he didn't have a right to his opinion. I said, quite simply, that if he played a game for a half hour, it is not enough time to know a player base nor the staff well enough to review them. They simply replied with: Well what about the rest? So I replied with the rest is (and it IS) invalid as well, as he didn't spend more than a half hour playing. Let me ask you this. Would you log on to a PvP MMO, NOT even fight anyone, then write a review on the gameplay? Because the only difference in that and what Nasasistik did, is that this is an MORPG, not an MMORPG. And unless you're completely incompetent, then no, you wouldn't write a review on it in those circumstances, which Nasasistik did.

So basically in your logic, We would not be able to have criticized Osama so much in a personality matter for 9/11 because we don't know him. We can't call Drug-Addicts all bad either, because we don't know all of them well either.

What's the difference here? A monitor and a keyboard, but everyone does it anyways. Even you? Yes.

The point is, all I needed was 30 minutes of talking(Oh and I didn't use this key, I was on a sub of mine before you attack never seeing this in-game any of you.) with the player base as it was, and also the general hub of the game which has un-needed images, as well as the argument with LG10.

As it is though, the most I really gave attention to your community is how I only recommend it for people who like that genre of anime really. I said the game is "Borderline" on kindness, and you are further proving that here.(Also, most everyone on BYOND is borderline with kindness, seriously).
Staff is a bit slow, I spoke to someone who was staff trying to ask questions, they said "Ok" I asked one question and never once got an answer.

See? I didn't wrongly judge your community, I just did my reasoning to it generally with my first impression.(Which, in real life, as on the computer means allot!)

I never insulted the community, if you took it that way. Then sorry, but I will not withdraw what I said, and how I said it either.


Good day to you, Itsaku.

Legendary Goku 10 wrote:

Answer me this. Is the game's battlesystem any different from another rips? if so, how is it different?

Answer ME this. If it was, would he know? My point isn't that he's wrong, it's that even if he IS right, he doesn't know it, and so has no right to review it.


Nasasistik, you just proved my point. You reviewed a game based on your FIRST IMPRESSION. You didn't stay and get to know the commmunity, you didn't stay and do anything. You came in, looked around, and wrote a review. That would be like buying a new game, playing the tutorial, then writing a review for it. That's not how it's supposed to work. You're supposed to PLAY the game before you review it, not look around, and decide it's just another rip and review it as such. Even if it is just another rip, you can't just decide that it is and then review it as one, because you never actually found out if it was or not.

The fact is guys, that if you just randomly throw a guess out, and it happens to be correct, that doesn't mean you are entitled to anything whatsoever. You just threw out a random guess and got lucky. You didn't KNOW.

Nasasistik wrote:

I didn't randomly throw a guess out, and truthfully, I didn't even class it as a total rip until someone commented it as such here. and I meant first impression on the community part, I didn't say totally based on first impression for the other parts of the review, Itsaku. Don't twist my words, boy.

Whether you said those exact words or not is irrelevant. You played for a half hour. That's no more than a first impression. So don't try to wriggle out of it, boy.