ID:4487
 
Okay, here's a lay-in of a problem...

Deadline is Monday of next week.

----

(This problem is from another source; natually, I should not reveal this source until this contest is over ;)

Two men are playing 5 card draw poker. They decide to vary the game a bit:

Man #1: Hey, I've got an idea, let's play 5 card draw where we get to choose our cards.
Man #2: That seems kind of dumb, but alright.
Man #1: Okay, you go first.
Man #2: (picks the AKQJT of spades), okay I have a royal flush.
Man #1: (picks the AKQJT of hearts), so do I. Now do you want to draw any cards?
Man #2: Of course not.
Man #1: And I will also draw no cards. We tied! Okay my turn to go first...
Man #2: This seems kind of like a waste of time. All we can do it tie.
Man #1: Come on, one more time... if you think it's such a waste of time, would you wager $500 on it then?
Man #2: Ummm... fine, okay... (opens his wallet and pulls out $500).
Man #1: Alright, I'll go first...

The men proceed to play the game, and Man #1 wins $500. How did he win the game?

After being dedaeted by leftley with ease in the last contest I really need to think on this one. As I understand you are allowed to draw any amount of cards on your second go so pelase correct me if I am wrong.

1st man picks 4 aces. one of each suit.
2nd man cannot get a royal flush but he CAN take 9, 10, J, Q, K of hearsts to take the lead. the 1st man then discard all 3 aces except the ace of spades, meaning he can automatically choose the 10, J, Q and K of spades... royal flush is then unbeatable as all other aces are discarded?

Am I right this time? XD
Bahamatt: Would you like to wager against me using the 1st man's strategy?
hmm... sure! I'll pick 4 aces and a King of clubs!

I bet nothing though! :D
I'll wager you a 1-year membership.
Wouldn't Man #2 catch on when he notices all four aces are gone? If Man #2 wasn't retarded, he'd take all the kings. This question is moot!
If Man #2 wasn't retarded, he wouldn't have betted $500 ona game he thought was impossible for him to win. XD

I am starting to have second thouhts about my strategy. I did kind of rush into it- please tell me what is wrong with it Bootyboy. Also pelase clarify the rules of 5 card draw if you dont mind as I am very rusty. =\
I believe in most card games, either spades or dealer wins in the case of a tie. I could be wrong though.
Argh - my brain.

Ok Bootyboy i'll wager you a byond 1-year membership!

I choose... *dramatic pause*

four 10's, and a 9 of clubs (I don't reckon the last card matters as I think the best method is to block the other player from getting the highest flush possible. Your turn! =D
Congrats Bahamatt, you've won!
O.O I didn't even get too read the blog post intell it was over this time. Tell me is it torture?

[EDIT] Ohh sorry congratulations Bahamatt.
(now we know how Bootyboy pays for all these free memberships! - Just kidding - i'm sure you work very hard.)

Cheers for the membership! It is very muched appreciated. Shall give you thanks when I get a members page up. :)
I wounder though... Why wouldn't the 2nd man just pick 4 queens his first time. The first man could then not get a royal flush and would be left to only hold his 4 aces or take a lower card combination than a Q high Straight flush
1st man draws TTTT9,
2nd man draws QQQQJ
1st man discards TTT9, draws Jack high straight flush.
2nd man can't beat it because all of the tens have been used.
man #2 fell asleep or die or became dumb and pick the wonrd card and dealer wins if a tie
Wright402 wrote:
man #2 fell asleep or die or became dumb and pick the wonrd card and dealer wins if a tie

Here's a hint: check the dates you post to - this is over 4 years old!