Just to let you know

ID:28761
 
Mar 25 2007, 12:55 pm
(Enter large comment so people need to click on it to see it here plox)enterotherstuffforthesamereasonhereblahblah

Hedgemistress is a messenger of the gods. For some reason everything she says is the truth. Her game-developing philosophy, her thoughts on Windows, her negativity against Firefox..

It all makes sense and people only say otherwise because they like to be different.

All hail the truthspeaker.
-Mech
Mar 25 2007, 1:15 pm
What a joke.
Mar 25 2007, 1:17 pm
Keeth wrote:
What a joke.

Its the truth o.o
Mar 25 2007, 1:29 pm (Edited on Mar 25 2007, 1:44 pm)
But it isn't.
Mar 25 2007, 1:30 pm
Keeth wrote:
But it isn't.

It is. Note the fact that she also uses better grammar than 60% of BYOND.
Mar 25 2007, 1:45 pm
Her negativety towards Firefox is unwarranted and is most likely brought from her conceited ways after used Internet Explorer for so long.

Game developing philosophy is extremely subjective, it cannot be right or wrong. Like art cannot be labeled indefinately bad or good just because it doesn't appeal to some people. It works for some, and not for others.

Grammar doesn't warrant any type of godlike status either. Some people choose to apply it, some people don't.

Capitalizing your 'i's will not grant you some sort of righteous title.
Mar 25 2007, 1:48 pm
Keeth wrote:
Her negativety towards Firefox is unwarranted and is most likely brought from her conceited ways after used Internet Explorer for so long.

Game developing philosophy is extremely subjective, it cannot be right or wrong. Like art cannot be labeled indefinately bad or good just because it doesn't appeal to some people. It works for some, and not for others.

Grammar doesn't warrant any type of godlike status either. Some people choose to apply it, some people don't.

Capitalizing your 'i's will not grant you some sort of righteous title.

1- She actually uses proven knowledge to show the flaws in Firefox.
2- I can see some right in your words, but the way she produces games whilst listening to the comments and suggestions of everyone and letting everyone has a chance seems to be a head above a few.
3-People that have better grammar seem more professional, meaning that people usually pick people with better grammar over the people that have bad grammar. Which is obviously the reason why noone listens to me.
Mar 25 2007, 2:43 pm
Grammar doesn't warrant any type of godlike status either. Some people choose to apply it, some people don't.

Interesting.

Because I thought the whole advantage of Firefox stems from its adherence to communication standards, to the idea that we have agreed upon ways in which a given piece of information is to be communicated, in order that it may be understood equally well by all...

...and that is what grammar and proper language boils down to. The written word is the original "mark up language" and the rules it is meant to follow are the ultimate standards.

If everybody just writes and speaks however they feel like, then what do the W3C standards even mean? Couldn't one browser maker look at it and go, "Well, to me, this means something different than what it means to you, so we're all equally right."

If grammar is optional, then who's to say IE isn't actually following the W3C standards as they understand them?

Who's to say that when you say, "Firefox is better.", you don't mean "is" meaning "is not?"
Mar 25 2007, 6:30 pm
Hedgemistress wrote:
Grammar doesn't warrant any type of godlike status either. Some people choose to apply it, some people don't.

Interesting.

Because I thought the whole advantage of Firefox stems from its adherence to communication standards, to the idea that we have agreed upon ways in which a given piece of information is to be communicated, in order that it may be understood equally well by all...

...and that is what grammar and proper language boils down to. The written word is the original "mark up language" and the rules it is meant to follow are the ultimate standards.

If everybody just writes and speaks however they feel like, then what do the W3C standards even mean? Couldn't one browser maker look at it and go, "Well, to me, this means something different than what it means to you, so we're all equally right."

If grammar is optional, then who's to say IE isn't actually following the W3C standards as they understand them?

Who's to say that when you say, "Firefox is better.", you don't mean "is" meaning "is not?"

Then how to you explain IE in this instance?
Mar 25 2007, 7:36 pm
I'm not sure what you're trying to say in that post... I've never noticed a difference in how IE renders tables based on whether you squish stuff on one line or not, and that is something I've had to play with before.

But in any event, I have no explanation for IE, at any level.

Fortunately for the majority of computer users in the world, IE requires no explanation from me to continue existing.

Yay.