Hedgemistress wrote:
I downloaded 2.0 from the Firefox website... feel free to consider pursing this line of troubleshooting, but bear in mind that I'm unlikely to change my opinion of a browser based on "When it crashes from moving the cursor within a text field, it can restore your data!"

Lmao. That just made my day. Some kinda recovery system, eh? XD


Yes, it's a known problem that IE renders images with darker colors than intended. It's also incapable of rendering transparent pixels.

Anyway.

Jtgibson is my hero.
Not trying to be a fanboy, but switch to Opera.
I have IE and it's never crashed on me. It has only crashed when I've purposely made it crash.(Hehe)

I used Firefox for about 2 weeks thinking that I could load webpages faster in it then in IE, and I ended up getting a browser that took 2 minutes just to load a page when IE took just 40 seconds.(My comp was really slow back then)
There is so much nerd rage in here.
Good news, Firefox 2 will restore

Yes, and it cured my bone sickness, too.

In that case, you're too biased to have understood what FF was all about. =P

"If Firefox didn't work for you, your opinion doesn't count."

Or perhaps it involved using some "proprietary" technology that Microsoft introduced to the IE browser.

It was the standard Joomla admin template. Joomla's open source, i.e. magical and naturally cancer-curing. Try again.

But the vast majority of Internet pages were developed by web developers.

By web developers, for everyday users, most of whom are using IE.

So why is this conversation still going on?

Null argument. Most things that developers try to do don't work quite right in IE.

Again, drop the delusion that IE is the freak and this won't happen.

Is this a sane development process?

1. Choose to do something according to a standard you know isn't followed by the most commonly used browser.

2. Notice it doesn't work in the most commonly used browser.

3. Complain bitterly.

Follow whatever "standard" you want, but if you go the road less traveled don't complain about the lack of rest stops.

I've been considering making a fairly nifty blog layout, and it will be pretty incompatible with IE, because IE can't render as would be expected.

Again, this amounts to a religious argument. IE renders doesn't render as expected when your expectations are set to how Firefox will render them. It's your choice to not follow IE's expectations, not a flaw in IE for not following yours.

A couple of glitches is nothing.

It's nothing? Okay, I'll put my page back the way it was before the Firefox users started weighing in. When they complain about being unable to access the bottom items on the menus, I'll refer them to you.

Well, a large part of the BYOND community is that of developers, and the gamers here get to associate with the developers constantly. It's no wonder if Firefox has spread here rapidly

I'm not talking about the number of responses so much as the vehemence of them. I expect Firefox to be popular among any group that considers itself techon-savvy... it's a naked emperor thing. Who's going to admit to using IE and sounding like a n00b?

IE works, but it requires a ton of hacks on the development-end to get features to work near-intended.

Try adjusting your intentions, then.
Hedgemistress wrote:
I'm unlikely to change my opinion of a browser based on "When it crashes from moving the cursor within a text field, it can restore your data!"

Well, like I said, it may have been due to the page containing something proprietary to MSIE (perhaps there was one of the many JavaScript events that Microsoft made up, or perhaps there was some embedded Java content that tried to use some special IE feature, thinking---as you've pointed out---that 75% of the viewers would be using IE, and that the 15% that would crash would be insignificant).

As far as vulnerabilities, you might check out http://secunia.com/product/12434/ vs. http://secunia.com/product/12366/
As opposed to a JavaScript event that occurs in nature?
Hedgemistress wrote:
1. Choose to do something according to a standard you know isn't followed by the most commonly used browser.

2. Notice it doesn't work in the most commonly used browser.

3. Complain bitterly.

Follow whatever "standard" you want,

The "standard," as you put it, doesn't matter one bit, if IE's proprietary renderer has no method of achieving the same effect in the layout. I've come upon several cases where IE has no way to properly align content, be it images, tables, or what-have-you.
http://secunia.com/graph/?type=imp&period=all&prod=12434
Firefox
http://secunia.com/graph/?type=imp&period=all&prod=12366
IE

Seems to be that Firefox has a entire collage of security issues(including exposure of sensitive information), while IE only has a few security issues but all of them are reasonably serious but can be fixed over time. Also 50% of the problems with IE have to do with the user being an idiot and not checking things before they open them.

Firefox loses.
OMFG SO MANY COMMENTS
Squeegy wrote:
OMFG SO MANY COMMENTS

What browser you use is a sensitive topic for obvious reasons. Without a browser, you couldn't... browse..
Mechana2412 wrote:
http://secunia.com/graph/?type=imp&period=all&prod=12434
Firefox
http://secunia.com/graph/?type=imp&period=all&prod=12366
IE

Seems to be that Firefox has a entire collage of security issues

You must have missed the part in the images where it said Firefox had 6 advisories, and IE had 9. So IE has 3 more advisories, and altogether more critical advisories.

Also...
FF: http://secunia.com/graph/?type=sol&period=2007&prod=12434
IE: http://secunia.com/graph/?type=sol&period=2007&prod=12366
Hiead, the problem amounts to you trying to do something that the majority of the users' browsers don't support. It's up to you how much time you want to spend in Step 3, or if you prefer to avoid it entirely by adjusting your intentions to be in line with reality.

Yeah, sucks that you can't do every cool thing that crosses your mind, but that's reality.

Let me put it this way:

I am not as computer savvy as you guys. If the fact that I'm on IE instead of Firefox didn't tell you that, I'll tell you now. I'm not a web designer. I'm not a great programmer.

I'm also a representation of the majority of computer users.

I don't like Firefox. I don't see any reason to change, and I'm not being presented with any.

You'll get some of us with the cult/Emperor's clothes thing... as much as I deride it... that is really the only thing Firefox has going on that matters in the marketplace of ideas as they apply to the average consumers... but I don't think that'll be enough to topple IE completely.

You can say people just IE because it came with their operating system... but you know what? In the absence of a truly compelling advantage, that's all it takes. Why get out of the comfy chair you're in to get to another comfy chair across the room? Because one is more convenient for interior designers trying to arrange a room around? That doesn't matter to me. I'm comfortable.

If the interior designer community truly would benefit from everybody using the other chair, they need to figure out how to make that chair attractive to people who are already seated, not go "OMG that chair doesn't follow standards!"
Hiead wrote:
Mechana2412 wrote:
http://secunia.com/graph/?type=imp&period=all&prod=12434
Firefox
http://secunia.com/graph/?type=imp&period=all&prod=12366
IE

Seems to be that Firefox has a entire collage of security issues

You must have missed the part in the images where it said Firefox had 6 advisories, and IE had 9. So IE has 3 more advisories, and altogether more critical advisories.

Also...
FF: http://secunia.com/graph/?type=sol&period=2007&prod=12434
IE: http://secunia.com/graph/?type=sol&period=2007&prod=12366

Note the fact that those graphs of yours are based on the reports from 2003 to 2007. That means that its also based on old versions of IE, including the old ones that didn't have the problems patched until later versions.

Which means that those statistics cannot be used as any real means of telling what kind of problems IE7 has, while Firefox has only had 2 versions so far meaning that it most likely has problems with the current version.
Hedgemistress wrote:
Hiead, the problem amounts to you trying to do something that the majority of the users' browsers don't support. It's up to you how much time you want to spend in Step 3, or if you prefer to avoid it entirely by adjusting your intentions to be in line with reality.

Yeah, sucks that you can't do every cool thing that crosses your mind, but that's reality.

Let me put it this way:

I am not as computer savvy as you guys. If the fact that I'm on IE instead of Firefox didn't tell you that, I'll tell you now. I'm not a web designer. I'm not a great programmer.

I'm also a representation of the majority of computer users.

I don't like Firefox. I don't see any reason to change, and I'm not being presented with any.

You'll get some of us with the cult/Emperor's clothes thing... as much as I deride it... that is really the only thing Firefox has going on that matters in the marketplace of ideas as they apply to the average consumers... but I don't think that'll be enough to topple IE completely.

You can say people just IE because it came with their operating system... but you know what? In the absence of a truly compelling advantage, that's all it takes. Why get out of the comfy chair you're in to get to another comfy chair across the room? Because one is more convenient for interior designers trying to arrange a room around? That doesn't matter to me. I'm comfortable.

If the interior designer community truly would benefit from everybody using the other chair, they need to figure out how to make that chair attractive to people who are already seated, not go "OMG that chair doesn't follow standards!"

This statement supports my assumption that Hedge is a messenger of the gods.

IE is completely broken on my computer. :( One day I tried to run it and it wanted me to update to a new version, so I went to Microsoft's site to download it...and ever since then, it's incapable of opening web pages. I even tried downgrading it and it still can't open web pages any more.

If there's one advantage I thought Internet Explorer had over Firefox, was that it handled embedded sounds in websites without having to tinker with it. I spent hours trying to install Quicktime/Quicktime Alternative before Firefox finally accepted it, and there are still a couple of file types that'll cause the browser to crash completely.

I still love the lil' fox, though.
Hedge please close this topic.
Squeegy wrote:
Hedge please close this topic.

Why? Its a topic thats getting alot of replies and is actually making some people see the truth that IE is better than Firefox in more ways than one.
if(you_like_popups[and_some_distortion] == TRUE) stay.Faithful()
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6