ok that is true...it is only very recently, if you call the past 8 years very recently.
Considering games have been around as a popular medium since the 1970's, yes, it is very recently.
1: they werent all islamic countries
2: a lot of countries in europe banned the game
Thing is, I can't find a single reference to the game being banned in any country except Islamic countries. If you can dig up a reliable source stating that it's been banned in one of those countries, then I'll concede your point.
actually the germans/friench/spanish shouldn't care about muslims
I can't find any reference to Germany, France, or Spain banning Call of Duty 4.
because "if" their blind ignorance? who was your english teacher? wow! whoever it was sucked!
Now you're just trying to throw in a red-herring. Anyone with a small bit of understanding of the English language could tell that was a typo of "of", not intended to be the word "if". You're obviously just attempting to throw this in because you can't think of a good reply. If you're so adamant about perfect grammar when you seem to be entirely incapable of anything resembling it, then here, I'll play your little game and correct a single letter so you can comprehend it:
"Oh, wow, I'm sorry, I didn't know you could get into my head and know that I think the world revolves around me (which I don't). I probably have more perspective on how insignificant each and every one of us is than most people, just because of their blind ignorance."
you realize that YOU started the argument not me, if i remember correclty, i posted a comment then you pretty much said it was a stupid comment, then i just tried to justify it
Thing is, I don't feel that arguing is inferior to not arguing. You do. I don't have to attempt to take the stance you feel is a better stance. I pointed out the error of your logic in an argument against what you said. You, on the other hand, seem to feel that not arguing is superior, yet continue to take the so-called inferior route.
that's also bull, and i know that because i'm currently studying the civil war in social studies!
Then your teacher is an idiot. Slavery was almost a non-issue, and if Abraham Lincoln hadn't put forth the Emancipation Proclomation, the Civil War would not automatically bring depictions of the freeing of the slaves to mind. Lincoln was a good man and a very good president, but I'm uncertain if he would have done the same thing if freeing the slaves had not produced a strategical advantage.
that's bull and does not deserve a reply
(this one does not even deserve a reply)
that's also bull and does not deserve a response
bull, no response
Or can you just not come up with a good reply?
a lot of these comments are so stupid and misleading that they dont even deserve an answer!
Popisfizzy wrote:
ok that is true...it is only very recently, if you call the past 8 years very recently.
1: they werent all islamic countries
2: a lot of countries in europe banned the game
(this one does not even deserve a reply)
actually the germans/friench/spanish shouldn't care about muslims
that's bull and does not deserve a reply
that's also bull and does not deserve a response
because "if" their blind ignorance? who was your english teacher? wow! whoever it was sucked!
you realize that YOU started the argument not me, if i remember correclty, i posted a comment then you pretty much said it was a stupid comment, then i just tried to justify it
bull, no response
that's also bull, and i know that because i'm currently studying the civil war in social studies!