Loose Change Video

Page: 1 2 3
Jul 28 2006, 3:31 am
In response to EGUY
Actually, it was one... I believe CBS has its paired-down version of reporting on 9/11/01 for sale on tape. (I saw it in school, which was the first time I saw it: that day, in my school, there was a grand (successful) conspiracy to hide the news from us students.) Despite having to tough it out through Dan Rather's annoying voice, it shows all of the video of the Towers and the Pentagon. In one shot of the latter, you can see what looks to be a charred plane's tail sticking out of the smoke, if I remember correctly.


--Vito
Jul 28 2006, 6:32 am
How can people say Bush is so dumb, and they say he organized and help execute a huge conspiracy?
Jul 28 2006, 7:16 am
In response to Airjoe
Maybe because he did such a bad job of a coverup of the conspiracy?
Jul 28 2006, 5:04 pm
In response to Vito Stolidus
Vito Stolidus wrote:
And how is Fox news 1/2 of all televised news media? They're beating the networks handily, but I don't think they beat all of them combined.

Note: "That I've seen." Naturally (and thankfully) my exposure to US media is limited. That's why I didn't phrase it as a statement of fact.

We won't ever come to a consensus on this one.

Very true.

Fox only looks Pro-Bush because of what it's compared to. (CBS, NBC, ABC, MSNBC, CNN, etc)
[...]
All news media has bias, because it's done by human beings. That I could accept. What makes Fox different from the older networks is that their bias isn't deliberate.

Gonna have to disagree with you there. I've seen clips of Fox News that are clearly deliberately biased heavily towards the right. If I could remember where I saw them then I'd point them out, but it was a while ago.
Jul 30 2006, 1:24 pm
In response to Crispy
If you do find an example, please, let me see. Remember, I can give you one example of TV media being terribly biased againsed Bush intentionally (CBS, Dan Rather) and probably a dozen printed-word instances of the same from major magazines and newspapers (Original Newsweek Guantanimo story, half the facts used in Editorials at the New York Times [off-topic: the new Times slogan - "All the treason that's fit to print... and then some!"], etc, etc, etc).


--Vito
Jul 31 2006, 4:22 am
Jul 31 2006, 4:43 am
In response to EGUY
Yeah, Nesso beat you to it 4 days ago. :P
Jul 31 2006, 1:52 pm
In response to GokuDBZ3128
GokuDBZ3128 wrote:
Also, did you know that while the building was blowing up, people were saying they could here bombs going off, or what sounded like bombs, before the plan even hit, and while the plan hit, and even after it?

I think the fact that people claim to have heard explosions before the planes hit actually explains why people claimed to have heard explosions afterwards. People have just gone 'well, I think I heard a bang, it must have been explosions in the building'.
That sort of thing happens a lot when police question whitnesses. The whitness wants to be helpful and remembers things that didn't happen (or happened differently) because they subconciously filled in vague memories with outside influences.

At the end of the day though what's easier to believe, the American Government staged and covered-up a truely massive terrorist act that would instantly become a major part of American history yet they were stupid enough to set off bombs (which everyone would hear, not just some) before the planes even hit, or that some people got confused.
If the government did do this, no one in their right mind would have gone along with it unless it was absolutely 150% fool-proof. There wouldn't be any of this 'evidence'.


Money can go a long way. I bet a few million dollars will make these guys pro-Bush.

Money doesn't go that far. Given the choice between being financially made for life and living forever in the history books for doing the right thing I'd say the majority of people would choose the second option (especially seeing as most people who would be in the position to expose this would be in a pretty sweet position financially already and/or smart enough to figure out they'll make a lot of money from selling their story).
The only thing I'd see stopping someone from exposing this is the backlash it would have on the country, but even then I'm sure someone would have exposed it before it happened.
Jul 31 2006, 8:12 pm
In response to EGUY
that guy is brutal lol XD also that 20$ bill thing is cool XD
Aug 3 2006, 10:44 am
In response to Yami_Marik0
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html

PM examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.

:D
Page: 1 2 3