Next time, if you ban me from the forums, be sure to give me a link to where I bumped.
I lost the origonal message but it went something like this:
I have told you many times, not to bump posts that have either not gone off of the page, or not have waited 24 hours.
It would have been nice to know which post I bumped illegeally, (in the two warnings I got much eariler.)
I don't remember bumping any post that hadn't gone off the first page, but I usually bump without noticing so...
Anyway, I just think that would it help if you showed evidence to the person that was banned, just so where they don't wine and compliagn.
(I'm giving suggestions, not wineing)
ID:276331
 Jul 28 2005, 4:34 am
|
|
|
Jul 28 2005, 4:44 am
|
|
Elation
 |
Maybe you should send this to the support form.
|
Nah, Tried that many times, never got answeres back.
I don't trust the support form anymore >=( Once, I had to ask them something, and it took MONTHS for them to reply. | |
Flame Sage wrote:
Next time, if you ban me from the forums, be sure to give me a link to where I bumped. You did that a lot. You wouldn't be able to see such links, though, because your bumps were deleted. And this also happened over a long period as a pretty well-established pattern of behavior, so since the admin actions list doesn't go back that far we couldn't give you dates or anything. At any rate you were pretty flagrantly ignoring the bump rule. Wait 24 hours, and until your post is off the first page of its forum. That's pretty well-known, and you certainly knew it from previous warnings. Occasionally that rule is slightly fungible, but I stress "slightly". It would have been nice to know which post I bumped illegeally, (in the two warnings I got much eariler.) The rule is not just the first page, but 24 hours. That's common knowledge, and you knew it too. Anyway, I just think that would it help if you showed evidence to the person that was banned, just so where they don't wine and compliagn. It's not feasible to do this in every case, or even in some of them. In the case of bad bumps it's not even possible. The point is, you've been bumping inappropriately a lot and already ignored two warnings before this. Since there's no possible way you were unaware of the rule since you were outright told about it, the only conclusion to draw from there is that you just don't care. Incidentally, the last post you bumped, in Code Problems, is now eligible for a legal bump. Lumomx JR | |
Sniper Joe wrote:
Strange, I got myne back the next day, they just don't like you I bet :) Same here. The longest I ever had to wait was three days. Except for one time that I never got a reply, but I wasn't really expecting one. | |
Jamesburrow wrote:
Sniper Joe wrote: I've been waiting a week. ~>Jiskuha | |
How long it takes to get a reply usually depends on your query. If you ask a basic question that anyone on the support team can answer, then it's possible to get a reply ten minutes later. However if you asked something that only a specific person can answer you've got to wait until they are around, see it and have time to answer it.
| |
Lummox JR wrote:
At any rate you were pretty flagrantly ignoring the bump rule. Wait 24 hours, and until your post is off the first page of its forum. That's pretty well-known, and you certainly knew it from previous warnings. Occasionally that rule is slightly fungible, but I stress "slightly". I, on my previous key, only knew that 24 hr rule after I broke it once and somebody was kind enough to provide me with such details. Although I was the one to blame for lack of knowledge, I do think that it is a little bad to assume that the rule is well-known. Lumomx JR TYPO! =) RD [EDIT] Oops, gotta get used to Hiead | |
Maybe they really don't want to hear from annyoing people. ;)
The staff is probably busy doing other things, or there is just a big line up. | |