JordanUl wrote:
What your talking about is the coveted Quest 64. It was reviewed horribly, but general concensus stands that it was great for a system launch game. Unless you want to count the Zelda's thats about it. Well that and Paper Mario, which was a sidescroller. i dont think that Quest 64 was a launch game, and i thought it was more of an action/adventure game. Aidyn Chronicles was the game i was thinking of. | |
OneFishDown wrote:
square isn't the only company that makes RPGs. the SNES had lots of RPGs. i can only think of one for the N64. there was probably more, but it was a long time after the release of the N64 that RPGs came out for it. For example, Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars (Best RPG evar!), Final Fantasy 2-3; 5(Best 2D RPG evar!) for the SNES, and Paper Mario for the N64. :) | |
DarkView wrote:
Nathandx82 wrote: Get an iriver. Rest my case. | |
Critical wrote:
Get an iriver. Rest my case. While I haven't used one, from the look of it I would never buy one for listening to music. I'd rather just buy a digital camera and an iPod. | |
Nintendo was ALWAYS the best rpg maker. When was the last time there was a good sony rpg? (Don't you dare say FF)
The Final Fantasy games went to hell after they got more technology in them. They were better with all the swords & magic, not guns & gernades. | |
While I wouldn't say they went to hell *hides FF*, they certainly became stranger. I always wondered why the heck would anybody still be using a sword when you could exchange it for a machinegun. At least in FFX there was some sort of excuse (church teachings declared the use of machines evil, though not everybody followed the church).
| |
Jermman wrote:
Nintendo was ALWAYS the best rpg maker. When was the last time there was a good sony rpg? (Don't you dare say FF) The developers seem to disagree with you. Nintendo reports only 29 RPGs for the Gamecube: http://www.nintendo.com/ gamecategory?cf=RPG&sf=NINTENDO+GAMECUBE&ef= Sony reports 78 RPGs: http://www.us.playstation.com/gamefinder.aspx (You'll have to enter the search parameters for PS2 RPGs yourself.) I play whatever games interest me regardless of the console they are on. It's the game that matters, not the platform. Personally I find that the very best RPGs are played without a console at all; eating pizza with about 6 friends while fighting the good fight with some paper, pencils, and a handful of funny shaped dice. :p | |
Shadowdarke wrote:>
I play whatever games interest me regardless of the console they are on. It's the game that matters, not the platform. Personally I find that the very best RPGs are played without a console at all; eating pizza with about 6 friends while fighting the good fight with some paper, pencils, and a handful of funny shaped dice. :p And for those that have lives... :P | |
Sarm wrote:
Those that have lives wouldn't be debating about the size of their consoles to begin with. ;) Hey, at least us Geeks only debate size with consoles. >_> | |
True, that is the best type of RPG(At least with a good DM/GM/Host) I have spent quite a few nights sitting round a table with friends, doing just that.
| |
Elation wrote:
And for those that have lives... And for those that have lives, they play games with their friends, regardless of the where it is played. A life, in this case, is defined as someone who does stuff with friends, has a job, and generally average person. I personally fit the description pretty well, except I have no girl friend. I play PnP games quite often. They are a fun way to relax and hang out. Some people even enjoy some pucker while we play. Being cool and popular are all opinional, so as long as I have friends and am happy, I am cool and popular. And for those that don't have lives...go sit in your room for 12 hours straight, pretending to be a Jedi Knight or Cloud. | |
And for those that don't have lives...go sit in your room for 12 hours straight, pretending to be a Jedi Knight or Cloud. BAHAAHA! That right there made me crack up :). ~>Jiskuha | |
Super Nintendo was the best system in my opinion.
Most games today rely on the graphics and stuff and not on the gameplay and the fun. | |
Hehe, I just wanted to post on this amazingly large thread...
Heh, I read almost all the posts, by the time I finished my eyes were bleeding. -------------------------------- Personally though, I'm partial to side with the old, yet reliable Nintendo. Sony has done a good job too, but can't ignore the work on the Nintendo series... I still have my old "N64" but rarely play it, I'm one of those graphics hogs and such. Plus, I'm attached to my good 'ol friend, technology, so go DS! <_< Anyway, blah. - Super Squirrel -------------------------------- Quote: One who eats his feces is on the brink of destruction. | |
I read an article in a magazine about how games were getting more and more serious - there used to be 'funny' games like Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, and 'How to be a complete B*****D', but now games have moved on to being mostly about killing, war and violence.
| |
Hazman wrote:
I read an article in a magazine about how games were getting more and more serious - there used to be 'funny' games like Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, and 'How to be a complete B*****D', but now games have moved on to being mostly about killing, war and violence. That's because war rocks! | |
Aw shucks.