ID:275833
 Dec 17 2004, 1:36 pm
|
|
A girl is attending her grandma's funeral, at the funeral she meets a guy, they get along and talk and have a good time. The next day the girl kills her sister. Why?
| |
|
Dec 17 2004, 1:42 pm
|
|
Smoko
 |
I dunno, Is the guy that she met have any form of relation ship with her sister?
|
Actually, i don't have the mind of one (Which is a good thing). I just now understood what "She forgot to get the guys phone number" meant. It means, she killed her sister in anger that she forgot it... OR She killed her so she could go to another funeral and meet another guy. Why didn't i get that the first time? :| | |
She forgot to get his number.
| |
I know, I know. :P. The woman did that so she can see the man again. I've heard it too many times before, so I KNOW that this is right.
| |
No matter how many e-mail forwards claim this is an actual psychological test, it's just some crap somebody thought up that has nothing to do with anything (although it does bear some resemblance to an ancient Japanese cautionary tale about a teenage arsonist.) Answering the question right has nothing to do with having the mind of a serial killer. No serial killer in the history of the world ever had a mind that worked like that. Even if a potential serial killer had a mind like that, they would've got caught on their first or second victim, and that's not enough to qualify as a serial killing. :P
Now, a true sociopath (which is a different thing entirely from a serial killer) would see nothing wrong with killing someone to bring about a trivial gain to themselves... they don't really see anything wrong with anything. They still wouldn't do it because they would see the potential risk (loss of freedom or life when they get caught) as outweighing the potential gain, especially since they wouldn't have any more reason to value the guy than they did their own sister. By some measurements a sociopath is one of the least likely people to kill, because most murders are crimes of passion. A person either views others as valid beings worthy of forming an attachment to or they don't. A girl who saw her grandma and sister as faceless pawns to be casually disposed of wouldn't care enough about the guy to bother killing over him, would she? And on a final note, another flaw with this premise is that if you answer the question correctly, that means you have "the mind of a serial killer?" Really? Even if the test accurately described a serial killer, all answering the question would demonstrate is that you UNDERSTOOD the mind of a serial killer. If you had to be a serial killer to understood the mind of one, how would anybody devise this test? | |
Wait a minute... I'm seeing the perfect murder.
This would work for Man or woman, this could take days to months; 1 Know your victim: Make sure you know almost everything about them. (IE.Personal things,Kids,Wife,Job,Name,Birthdate,anything at all, location of house.) 2 "Accidentally" Meet them: Show sympathy, act like you might want to get to know them. (Be a friend, drinking buddy etc.) Be sure not to get to know any of thier friends. 3 Prepare yourself: Take any neccesary steps to avoid being caught. Always use Leather Gloves. As a cover-up get a cologne or a perfume, deoderant works as well. (spray kind) Be sure to have a rag or something to clean up with. Be sure to set a list up in your mind. (IE. Not to leave anything behind.) 4 Once you know your Victim: Now that you know your Victim. Set up a time. Anywhere private. (day,evening,night whatever. This would work best when alone with your Victim.) Make sure noone else knows of your meeting. 5 Proceed with murder: Any house in the world has a weapon. Take these means to conventional use. (A knife,pen,monitor,hands, feet) Proceed with murder. Make it quick and fast and that the Victim does NOT have time to react. Swiftly, so that your Victim doesn't make alot of noise. The best way to kill is to attack the head or throat. 6 The clean-up: No doubt in any murderer's mind that there will be blood involved. This is where your precautions come in. If your Victim made alot of noise it is best to give yourself a time limit. 5 minutes at tops, because if anyone heard your Victim last gasps of noise, they might phone the police. Make the clean-up as swift and clean just as you murdered your Victim. Be sure not to leave any blood. Carefully place to body in a bag of some sort.(Best a Garbage bag with little rubish in it to cover up the smell. This is another part where your prcautions come in, the cover-up. Spray (best use) it all over the now dead body. (This will prevent the smell of rot for atmost a few days.) Dispose the body and location you see fit and drive/walk away a happy Murderer. I have not murdered someone and never will. I don't hate anyone that much. But for yose of you looking for a way. Here you go. It may be lengthy, but it gets the job done. And dear God I feel evil. :) --Mekan-- | |
Ah, there are much better ways... But I'm not gonna go into those details. Once you've seen every episode of CSI: you'll figure it out.
| |
She'll meet another guy at her sister's funeral?
| |
Because the guy is Satan :)
| |
Serial killers do have a lot of spare time, Lexy... For all you know, one could have been sitting there at his dayjob thinking: "Hey, I'm bored, I'll see how many people answer this e-mail like I would!" and just start knocking away sending chain letters left and right...
Yeah... I feel dumb even having said that... The entire concept of profiling is taken too seriously. Someone who has criminal thoughts isn't a criminal. I'd be more worried about someone who didn't have criminal thoughts, seeing as one day that person is just going to snap and kill 3/4ths of humanity. Look at Hitler, I mean, he was a painter until suddenly he snapped (An art dealer broke his promise to showcase his work. Or at least, that's how the story goes.). Do painters go and kill entire races? No. Dictators do, but not painters. So what, just because I like to paint, by your logic am I going to kill 6 million some-odd jews? Seeing as I'm not contributing ANYTHING resembling coherent thought, I'm probably just going to get back to work... | |
Hey, maybe the company that was going to deal his art was jewish, and then they denied him, and he got pissed? XD
| |
That is how the story goes... The art dealer was Jewish, and told Hitler he was too rigid, and advised him to get out of the propaganda movement. Hitler didn't have any money, so he kept speaking in public so he'd get payed by the german army.
Anyway, as the story goes, the art dealer didn't show up to discuss Hitler's work. Many versions of this story include a bunch of anti-semites beating the art dealer to death while he was on the way. So, Hitler gets angry and makes a bunch of sketches, most of which were actually really scary. The sketches were of a "new society". They were pretty reminiscient of socialist propaganda. He tries to continue painting, fails miserably, then goes where the money is at, propaganda. Of course, most of this is probably sensationalized and moderately fictional, but the basis of the story stands firm. Hitler: Soldier -> Painter -> Provocateur -> Prisoner -> Dictator -> Unidentifiable remains. | |