In response to Lesbian Assassin
Umm, the terrorist, if any, might not need credit, what if they just wanted to get rid of any experimental conclusions found by the crew coming to earth, or they might just kill for the fun of it. Also, i never said I think theres a terrorist, I was asking for everyones opinion and take on this subject, nowhere did i say I think a terrorost did this.
The Conjuror
In response to The Conjuror
The Conjuror wrote:
Umm, the terrorist, if any, might not need credit,

"I know! Even though we've just pulled of a coup so impressive that the U.S. doesn't believe it to be practically possible, we'll let them think it was just a freak accident. That will strike terror into their hearts!"


what if they just wanted to get rid of any experimental conclusions found by the crew coming to earth,

"Merciful Allah! If the Great Satan is allowed to discover the pattern of roots in plants which germinate in zero gravity, then our cause is truly doomed!"

or they might just kill for the fun of it.

Yeah, 7 people. Really gets them in the terrorist hall of fame.

Also, i never said I think theres a terrorist, I was asking for everyones opinion and take on this subject,

Then why do you whine so much about getting opinions?
In response to digitalmouse
Well, technically speaking the missle would not have to catch the shuttle, but intercept it head on... it was flying a pretty static flight path...easy to predict where it would be to within a few seconds.

Even so, and even if terrorists had a missile that could reach that altitude, it'd be a long shot (literally). Say you know the exact timing, speed, and position of when a housefly will cross a gymnasium, and you're standing at the other end of the gym with a BB gun. Your chances of hitting the fly are astronomically low -- so low that it isn't even worth your while to waste a BB trying.
In response to Gughunter
Just remeber, this is no fly and no BB.But your point is marked, i personaly dont think it had to do with any 3rd party, i just think it was a mistake made somewere, maybie a computer problem, maybie a design or production flaw.
In response to Scoobert
Actually, the prevailing theory is that it has a lot to do with a "small" accident on launch... A piece of insulation from the main fuel tank (the big orange one) fell off and struck the left wing shortly after the shuttle took off...

It was decided then that the damage was minimal, and not to worry about it...

Then, upon reentry, a bunch of sensors in the left wing went dead... And just before the explosion, the computers recorded a hard turn that the flight computer tried to correct...

This suggests that the damage on launch probably knocked a few of the heat tiles either loose or completely off of the left wing... Upon reentry, the heat on that wing (that was noe able to enter the craft due to missing heat tiles) burned the sensors first...and then caused major damage to the wing itself... Causing the ship to turn, because that wing was creating more drag than it was supposed to... At those speeds, and in that heat, any deviation from perfect aerodynamic alignment causes a lot of damage due to wind resistance... Probably akin to hitting a concrete wall... Think of it like a major belly flop into the pool off the high dive... In this case, those forces caused the ship to explode...

But don't get me wrong, I'm definitely not an expert, and I don't work for NASA...but these are the facts they've presented, along with some of my own personal conjecture...
In response to The Conjuror
The Conjuror wrote:
or they might just kill for the fun of it.


I'm sure they would spend their funds on a missle to strike down a space shuttle just for the fun of it!
Here is another issue, what about the fact that NASA is saying that we cant touch the debris, i think they are saying this just so they can get it for themselves because the fact that any germs or toxic bacteria could survive a decontamination process of every part of the ship, extremely cold temperatures in space, and extremelt hot temperatures while exploding, really doesnt make that much sense at all, it is know that bacteria cant survive in any of these three things, and all were applied.
My philosophy: We can't handle things on Earth right now, spending billions on the space project isn't going to help us. I say we take all of the money being spent on space exploration and turn it into something more useful.
In response to The Conjuror
What about water bears? Okay, so they aren't bacteria, but still....
In response to SuperSaiyanGokuX
ya i heard it was a problem with the left wing, but i didnt know anymore than that.
In response to SuperSaiyanGokuX
SuperSaiyanGokuX wrote:
Actually, the prevailing theory is that it has a lot to do
with a "small" accident on launch... A piece of insulation
from the main fuel tank (the big orange one) fell off and
struck the left wing shortly after the shuttle took off...

The problem that my friend at JSC hears the engineers scratching their chins about is that while the debris appears to have hit the wing on the leading edge, the temperature increases and subsequent sensor failures began at the *back* of the wing... Jeff says they hope to see that wing in more detail if and when it is recovered...

And, Gughunter, when my BB has fairly advanced avionics and heat tracking devices (gotta admit the shuttle was pretty hot at the time), I increase my chance of hitting that fly.

Anyway, as mentioned, the missle could not make it up there from a ground based facility, nor were there any other aircraft reported nearby... I'm confident this had no terrorist connections.
In response to Kusanagi
emm i am wondering i didnt read all that stuff in the middle but..

Is it true they found water on mars? Cause if it is that could help us amazingly since we are running out of clean water these days.O' wait a thought just came to me emm what if the water is not clean water. :/
In response to Pagemaster
Water is water. Saying there isn't enough clean water on Earth is even less valid than saying their isn't enough land on earth. 2/3rds of our planet is water (actually, 2/3rds of the surface area is water, but still, it's a lot). Even with that much water, the "dirty" water we have can be purified. It's not easy to get rid of water. You're going to have to do a lot more than dump radioactive waste into it. The only water that is truely wasted would be the stuff that astronauts drink, which is then, eventually, flushed into space.
In response to ADDiCt
Remember kids...Drug money funds terrorism.Now did they advertise that on tv before september 11.NO.
In response to Jacob
they dont use gas.
Page: 1 2 3 4