![]() Nov 16 2005, 8:36 am
In response to O-matic
|
|
Uh, no. It wastes space and is completely pointless to do else return when nothing is after it.
|
Artemio wrote:
Uh, no. It wastes space and is completely pointless to do else return when nothing is after it. I know that it's completely useless, but the reason I do that is because sometimes I can be a very unorganized programmer, if I am like that sometime I -nearly- always forget to add several things to verbs/procs. Whiles later (When I check the code on possible bugs) I see that I made stupid mistakes: I forgot an If() statement, some code after the last statement, and such. That's the main reason why I always put return at the end of an if()/else statement, ignoring wether there's something after it. O-matic |