I'll give you another call tonight, James - something came up last night. You're a piss poor debater who suggests ridiculous things such as "fact isn't truth," and it gives me a power trip. :-)
| |
Also would you like to speak German now?
| |
Also aren't Christians supposed to trust everyone or is your church like a spy church?
| |
aren't Christians supposed to trust everyone 10:16 Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves. 10:17 But beware of men: for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues; 10:18 And ye shall be brought before governors and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them and the Gentiles. | |
spy church
| |
Ben G wrote:
Also aren't Christians supposed to trust everyone or is your church like a spy church? Where do you get this idea from? Being honest != trusting everyone else to be. | |
He sounds homosexual. >_>
ALL SOUTHERN PEOPLE DO NOT TALK LIKE THAT. I WILL BE HAPPY TO BE IN AN INTERVIEW TO PROVE IT. | |
i was basically just trying to get him riled up but i appreciate your backup
| |
i never said all southerners sound as I do, I just said im a proud redneck southern 'stereotype'
You should hear me most the time though, when i stop paying attention i tend to slip into a southern drawl. But yeah, unfortunately not all who call themselves Christians are trustworthy. Really kinda sucks. People have to earn their trusts around here. Anyway, read Acts 2 about the speaking other languages thing. Its also mentioned in I Corinthians, chapter 12 I think. You might also want to read the official position paper of the Assemblies of God as to the subject of Baptism in the Spirit and speaking in Tongues as a sign there-of The Bible backs up my belief. History, Science,and Prophecy all provide proof as to where the Bible is concerned. On a final note, do you exist? From a philosophical standpoint, noone can really prove the existence or nonexistence of anything or anyone. | |
Thank you cspnyc, kline x 2!!, agosto, dallasmbg, zxgsxrfzr, dappa35, shaneruss, spinecrawler, zx1100c, juliainet, servowire, bookworm, ahh_bisto, surfing_guy, Kathryn, Lee B., sacrificesociety, wieler, dmwf, Mike, and Ben G
This is at southpark.dailybuzz.net Is it you? | |
Jamesburrow, do you believe in evolution?
| |
GDT: It dpeneds on the aspects of it. I do believe that there have been changes made to certain species through evolutionary processes, but I do not believe that mankind is the result thereof.
| |
because humans are outside of the biological processes of life despite all evidence that points otherwise
| |
No, there have even been changed in our anatomy (such as some people are no longer even born with tonsils, appendixes, etc), but for the most part the human being is still the same as when originally created.
For the most part, all evolution has done is create a wider variety of breeds (and the seperate human races) - but not the source of the actual creation of mankind There has been all sorts of things brought upon the human race by different genetical differences. | |
Jamesburrow wrote:
There has been all sorts of things brought upon the human race by different genetical differences. Oh shit! He's getting genetical with us! | |
No, there have even been changed in our anatomy (such as some people are no longer even born with tonsils, appendixes, etc), Hahaha, there aren't people born without tonsils or appendixes. You're so full of shit. For the most part, all evolution has done is create a wider variety of breeds (and the seperate human races).There has been all sorts of things brought upon the human race by different genetical differences. That's called natural selection and cross-breeding - not evolution. I find it humorous, to say the least, that you argue against evolution while not even knowing what it is. By the way, if you don't see the similarities between Homo sapiens and other species, such as Homo erectus and Homo habilis, you are stupid. | |
1. I learned about it in science class.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/ index?qid=20060811190446AATNOov http://www.angelfire.com/la3/3moons/3moons2.html (seach for tonsils) http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic.php?id=210633 (ditto) http://www.unsolvedmysteries.com/usm443689.html Just google 'born without tonsils' and youll find a ton of stuff. Its really interesting. We need to make a few adaptations, but for the most part we are perfect. 2. I dont know about where you are, but here that is taught as evolution. In biology class they taught saying that evolution was where there was a gradual change in the genetic information of a species in an area until two distinct breeds/species remain through a process of mutation, natural selection, and selective breeding. | |
1. You are so fucking dense. You can be born without any number of things as a genetic flaw (not any sort of adaptation). Let's look at what would be required for appendixes to disappear from humans:
a.) Modern medicine would need to be unable to treat appendicitis. As long as people whose appendixes become infected live, they will continue copulating. b.) More people need to get appendicitis. Currently, only around 15% of humans get it - not near enough for a genetic reformation. c.) There would have to be a gene that chose whether or not you were born with an appendix. To my knowledge, none exists, but rather, anyone born without one has a genetic flaw from mitosis. In conclusion, people can be born without tonsils or appendixes, but that's not evolution, that's an accident. 2. I don't even know what you're saying. Humans dividing in to different subraces is not evolution, it's natural selection and cross-breeding, like I said. In addition, black people and white people are not "two distinct breeds" any more than a golden retriever and black lab are. GAH | |
"In conclusion, people can be born without tonsils or appendixes, but that's not evolution, that's an accident."
Evolution is just a series of accidents, they don't always have to make things better. Just as long as they don't make it impossible for the being to survive. Most genetic mutations are not a good thing. However, occasionally they result in an end product that is better than the previous generation. Viruses don't consciously choose to produce offspring that are immune to medicines. Since the structure of a virus etc, is simple and because they replicate so fast, it is more conducive to having a genetic mutation have a major effect on it. Besides the new viruses that become immune, there are thousands of other mutations that didn't make it. Evolution and Natural Selection work hand in hand. Natural Selection is just survival of the fittest, whether it is between species or between mutated versions of the same one. Selective Breeding, or what is now being called, Sexual Selection, is only possible with species that are conscious of the benefit of breeding with people with "good genes." Humans are the only ones that can selectively breed ourselves. All other species will breed with basically any other creature of the same species without the intervention of humans. Humans don't breed as much as other species do. The more you breed, the more opportunities there are for changes to happen. | |
Super Military Translator Man.
But he can only do it if he's feeling the power of God within him, which could or could not be at the time it is seriously needed.