ID:191466
 Sep 19 2002, 2:35 pm
|
|
While some people think ghosts are definitly make beleive, I think they are real. I, right now that is, am fully aware someone will say something like "Those pictures are fake!" and such, but just figured I'd post them: http://www.ghostresearch.org/ghostpics/ . fake or not, they are freaky.
| |
|
Sep 19 2002, 2:43 pm
|
|
FuZzY DiCe
 |
isnt adobe photoshop fun?!
|
isnt adobe photoshop fun?! Here is a good rule: if your going to be sarcastic, atleast be funny about it. | |
i think ghosts are 100%........................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................Go down for the answer(SCROLL REALLY SLOWLY AND YOU MIGHT SEE THE ANSWER SOMEWHERE)
Almost there Just a little farther THERE! just a bit farther. <FONT SIZE = 55>BOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |
Geo wrote:
While some people think ghosts are definitly make beleive, I think they are real. I, right now that is, am fully aware someone will say something like "Those pictures are fake!" and such, but just figured I'd post them: http://www.ghostresearch.org/ghostpics/ . fake or not, they are freaky. None of those photos impressed me as being anything unusual. None of them. There is no reason to believe that a camera might see more than the human eye. The eye is many many times more sensitive to light. If something appears in the photo that you didn't see in the first place, it's the fault of the film. Here's a question for you. With high quality photography being a relatively inexpensive thing, why are all of those photos blurry, over- or under-exposed, and basically crappy looking? For the record, I believe in the possibility of ghosts. But I it makes a lot more sense that you would see it with your eyes, and it would fail to appear on film than the reverse. | |
Those pictures are fake! :) (See, someone did say it! hehe)
Seriously though, it is not hard to believe that those photos were faked. From the ones I looked at, I could even name the tools that could be used to create some of those effects. Clone brush anyone? In several of them, the lighting doesn't even look the same on different bits of the image (different colour, direction, etc.). And by the way, they don't look all that freaky to me. They're all too grainy and blurred for that. ;) | |