Crispy wrote:

Mrhat99au wrote:

Its not like they arent already dieing, killing a few more wont matter

You're just restating your original statement in different ways, rather than arguing my previous answers. I rest my case.

and also this is a war, and in wars, people die.

EXACTLY. That's why I'm arguing against having a war. Not that there's much of a point now, as it's already started. Bah humbug.

And dont you even try saying, how would you feel if you were one of them, because im not one of them and i never will be one of them, so there.

But what if you were? Would you still feel the same way? You're dodging my questions, and you know it.

Please, do the honourable thing and back out of this before you make yourself look like even more of an idiot.

Who do you think you are? Mr magical know it all war person, as a matter of fact, i bet you that i can make three paper clips out of a phone faster than you, so there!

If you hadnt noticed thats what im trying to do, so i can eventually dig my way to china.

maybe a forum spam banner?
or a song?

Just Spam wit me, just Spam wit me. just Spam wit me! Common now justa flame,wit me.just flame. then Ban! woahhoh !

Here comes those pesky mods.
here they come--
the bane of the offenders!

Here comes those pesky mods.
uooh uoohhh
Dont let them find those swear words.
uooh uh uh

Here comes those pesky mods.
Oh here they come
dont become mulitple offenders!

Here comes those pesky mods!

{ Maz loves the Moderators of the byond forum, and this 'song' is devoted to there consitent hard work and grace. most of the time ;o) }

Crispy wrote:

Waste the bandwidth all day long
(Tra la la la la, la la la, la, la)
Spam by posting silly songs
(Tra la la la la, la la la, la, la)

Bits and bytes come floating down
(Tra la la la la, la la la, la, la)
Fractured by the awful sound
(Tra la la la la, la la la, la, la)

Post useless threads about cheese
(Tra la la la la, la la la, la, la)
Watch the forums wilt with ease
(Tra la la la la, la la la, la, la)

Be resistant, be outstanding
(Tra la la la la, la la la, la, la)
Press on until permanent banning
(Tra la la la la, la la la, la, la)

Heh heh heh. (And ditto to Maz's disclaimer. =P )

No really i am, i have my spoon and im digging to china! Its great, soon ill be able to visit china!

..'Sure' to MrHats post..
but more importantly look what I dug up!
I found a picture of DanTom
Plus I found Crispy!

You aught to edit that post.

I like the way you italicized the part about breaking agreements... because that really strikes to the heart of the matter here.

Let's start by saying, out and out, I do not like Saddam Hussein. I would love to see him out of power, and/or out of existence.

The officially articulated U.S. position isn't that this is about oil, or terror, or even about broken treaties. It says Saddam is a threat to us. The foundation of that threat is the alleged weapons of mass destruction, which hearkens back to the treaty... but the treaty itself doesn't matter to Bush any more than NAFTA. Treaties are agreements, and agreements are for weak, second-rate and third-world countries.

So, Saddam is a security threat, and so we move in. Our goal is not to disarm him. Our goal is not even to depose him. Our goal is to kill him. If we sent in one person with a gun, this would be an assassination attempt on a head of state, and would violate both U.S. and international law. Instead, we're sending in cruise missiles and dropping bombs... word is still out on whether or not that violates either kind of law.

The U.S. has just established a precedent that no doubt alarms the hell out of the rest of the world, or at least anyone who's paying attention: if we deem your leadership is a threat to our security, we have the right to make war to rectify this situation.

Is it possible that we'll stop there? Hey, France tried to stangle our ability to protect our borders from Saddam's menace... clearly, their leadership is also a threat. Unless they relinquish their "permanent veto" power which they had the Gaulic gall to threaten us with, we have no choice but to view them as an enemy. Don't worry, we won't go after the citizens, just their elected representatives... and the best part is, we won't even need leaflets to teach them how to surrender effectively. Next, Britain. Yes, Britain's leadership is with us, but her people are against us. Therefore, we will leave Parliament and the other government institutions alone and bomb the hell out of the people.

Yes, that's exaggeration... not even Bush would go after nations in good standing with the international community (I hope.) Still, it's the fear of that kind of scenario that's going to be going through other world leaders, and it's going to really boost the anti-America movement.

Yes, the U.S. is the most powerful nation on earth by several measures. No, we don't need the U.N.'s permission or the world's support to reduce Baghdad to a pile of rubble. Does that mean it's a good idea for us to do so? Being the strongest in the room doesn't automatically mean that you're a bully or a tyrant... deciding that being the strongest is all it takes to put you in charge does, though.

It's not biological... it's chemical. I'm also sure that we used sulphur bombs.


<<>>Kusanagi<<>>

Dagolar wrote:

I am sick and tired of everyone saying we should all back the U.S. in their decision. "Let's just bow down and accept that the United States is the leading super power and that all decisions made there-from are correct. Resistance is futile. Join the willing".

I, for one, will not bow down. This war had a lot of protest to it and for good reason. Those protesters to the U.S. who now bow down are cowards. Stand up for what you believe.

-Dagolar

I Agree, Bush is a power hungry...theres only one word to discribe And it starts with B with 7 letters...Like in the news him talking to iraq "Do not abuse the oil" Was the first thing he said, he isnt In it for the terrorists, JUST TO Get more "power" As i have said a while ago, he is Hittler II!

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I think you misread Lexy's post. =)