1
2
Feb 18 2004, 4:10 pm
In response to Cheuq
|
|
There already are 3d printers.
|
In response to Jon88
|
|
Yes, I knew about that. Yes, your response was entirely predictable. Yes, you may be quiet now. ;-)
|
In response to Pagemaster
|
|
There are a few cards that only support 3D acceleration if you upgrade the drivers. In my experience, however, the vast majority either do support it out of the box, or don't support it at all.
You can try. I'm warning you now that it probably won't work, though. |
In response to Crispy
|
|
Crispy wrote:
Yes, I knew about that. Yes, your response was entirely predictable. Yes, you may be quiet now. ;-) Aha, so they'll figure it out, and then discover time travel based on it, which allows you to come back in time and make this post! All that's left to figure out is... what have you done with the present-time Crispy? :) |
In response to Pagemaster
|
|
In response to Jon88
|
|
I never said they have/will/whatever figure(d) it out. Your introduction of time travel into this conversation is entirely random, sir! =P
On a related note... would you like an instant of time as a present? |
In response to Jon88
|
|
Jon88 wrote:
Crispy wrote: Well, if I remember correctly from an article I read before (I'll try to find it later - at school right now), time travel would be very dangerous to the individual. For, it explained in theory that two persons can't occupy the same space/time. |
In response to Jon88
|
|
Jon88 wrote:
http://www.matrox.com/mga/support/drivers/latest/home.cfm Thanks,but which one do i download?. I tried 2 and i still didnt get "DIRECT 3D" highlighted when i typed in 'dxdiag' on 'run'. <font color = blue>Heres some Info from Dxdiag:</font color = blue> Operating System: Windows 2000. <font color = red>*DISPLAY TAB*</font color = red> --Device-- Name: Martrox Mystique PCI - English Manufacturer: Matrox Graphics Inc Chip Type: MGA-1164SG DAC Type: Integrated,220 MHz Approx. Total Memory: 2.0 MB Current Display Mode:1024 x 768(16 bit)(60Hz) Moniter: Default Moniter --Drivers-- Main Driver: MGAUD.dll Version: 5.00.2600.1820(English) Date: 2/14/2002 14:32:56 WHQL Logo'd: No Mini VDD: mgaum.sys VDD: n/a DDI Version: unknown <font color = red>**DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0b</font color = red> --DirectX Features-- DirectDraw Acceleration: Enabled Direct3D Acceleration: Not available AGP Texture Acceleration: Not available --Notes--(I'll only list the important facts) Direct3D functionality not available. You should verify that the driver is a final version from the hardware manufacturer. |
In response to Pagemaster
|
|
A 2 megabyte card most likely does not support direct3D. I have a 16 megabyte card, and it only supports up to direct3D 8(with 3rd party drivers). Your not going to get that card to support direct3D, give it up and get a new computer.
|
In response to Jotdaniel
|
|
Jotdaniel wrote:
A 2 megabyte card most likely does not support direct3D. I have a 16 megabyte card, and it only supports up to direct3D 8(with 3rd party drivers). Your not going to get that card to support direct3D, give it up and get a new computer. Really?, How can you tell how many megabytes a card has?. Now i am on a different computer with a different video.Is this any good? <font color = blue>Heres some Info from Dxdiag:</font color = blue> Operating System: Windows 2000. <font color = red>*DISPLAY TAB*</font color = red> --Device-- Name: S3 Trio64V2 Manufacturer: S3 Chip Type: S3 TrioV2 / SGRAM memory DAC Type: S3 SDAC Approx. Total Memory: 1.0 MB Current Display Mode:1024 x 768(8 bit)(60Hz) Moniter: NEC E11006Y20088DE --Drivers-- Main Driver: s3mtrio.dll Version: 5.1024.329.0002(English) Certified: No Mini VDD: s3m.sys VDD: <font color = red>**DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0b</font color = red> --DirectX Features-- DirectDraw Acceleration: Enabled Direct3D Acceleration: Not available AGP Texture Acceleration: Enabled I wonder what this means --Notes--(I'll only list the important facts) Direct3D functionality not available. You should verify that the driver is a final version from the hardware manufacturer. |
In response to Pagemaster
|
|
Pagemaster wrote:
Jotdaniel wrote: |
In response to Jotdaniel
|
|
Jotdaniel wrote:
Pagemaster wrote: So are you trying to say my second computer is even worse then my 1st? |
In response to Pagemaster
|
|
In the graphics department, yes, it is worse. Although the difference between 1 and 2 megs of video memory at this point in time doesnt much matter, neither will run any game within the past 5 or 6 years if it makes any use of direct3D.
|
1
2