In response to Shades
Hey, it would fix the problem with the low recruitment rates in the armed forces.
In response to Kujila
Kujila wrote:
Sean of the Dead?!

=O

~Kujila



"'Sup Niggas?"

=D

(Best line ever.)
In response to Elation
I saw Sean of the Dead but I didn't really like it. Perhaps cultural barriers? :P, IMO I think it was from how a big part of it was on Sean's life and not the zombies until about the last 1/3 of the movie. Kinda diulted the action I was hoping for. There were a lot of funny parts with how absurdly they handled the zombies.
In response to EGUY
Uh isnt it Shawn of the dead?
In response to Shades
Shades wrote:
Uh isnt it Shawn of the dead?

It's Shaun of the Dead.
In response to Shades
Did you hear about that labratory making zombie dogs (Honest to God, i'm not kidding. Kinda off topic though)
In response to EGUY
EGUY wrote:
I saw Sean of the Dead but I didn't really like it. Perhaps cultural barriers? :P, IMO I think it was from how a big part of it was on Sean's life and not the zombies until about the last 1/3 of the movie.


The zombies were there from pretty much the start!
In response to Shades
Nice summary, but there is no "Night of the Living Dead 2"... there is "Return of the Living Dead" 2 and 3, though. Again, both serieses are sequels to Night of the Living Dead. Romero and the Return Guy (don't remember his name) split the rights down the middle, including the rights to the name. Romero got to keep the "Night" part of the motif (night goes into dawn, dawn into day)... the other guy got the right to use "Living Dead" in his movie title.

There is no explanation of the zombies in Dawn/Day/Land -because- it was already explained in Night.
In response to Hedgemistress
See, myself I never connected any of the other movies except for living dead.

And I'll stay like that.

Besides, Dawn and Day came out before the colorized night of the living dead movies. So if they happened AFTER living dead, does that living dead was prequals or whatever?
Page: 1 2