ID:185720
 
Jack Thompson has a new book. Maybe you heard...

Out of Harm's Way is currently available on Amazon.com as well as other booksellers. GP can't comment on the tome's quality, since our copy hasn't yet arrived. It is pretty clear, however, that the book's early days have been plagued by bad Amazon reviews. It's possible - likely? - that many of the "reviewers" are reviewing the author, not his work. Most of the reviews have been of the one-star (out of five) variety, accompanied by negative, even nasty commentary about Thompson himself.

Out of Harm's Way has likewise been plagued with a slew of negative tags on Amazon, as well as linkage with books on gay erotica, presumably caused by mischevous back-and-forth clicking between Thompson's book and various sex manuals offered for sale by Amazon.

GP spoke with the controversial attorney about the book situation earlier in the week. At that time, Thompson blamed the bad write-ups on "pixelantes" (Thompson's term for gamers), and expressed the opinion that the reviews violated Amazon's terms of service. An exchange of e-mails that Thompson shared with GP today indicates how frustrating the situation has become for the outspoken Miami attorney.

First, there's this one from Amazon to Thompson:

"Thank you for writing to Amazon.com to bring these reviews to our attention. Please rest assured that these comments have been removed from our database and will disappear from the web site within 48 hours.

In the future, please report any review that you find inappropriate by clicking on the "report this" link.

We do exert some editorial control over our customer reviews and strive to block these kinds of reviews. Our intention is to make the customer review forum a place for constructive commentary and feedback, so reviews that fall outside these guidelines are either edited for compliance or are removed from the web site. Amazon.com does not tolerate profane or spurious customer reviews.

Again, I apologize for this situation and I'd like to thank you for taking the time to let us know. Feedback from conscientious individuals such as yourself helps us maintain the quality and integrity of our site... "

Thompson replied to Amazon as follows:

"I have found that the offending reviews are still up at your site, but I find, interestingly, that a review by someone calling himself "Bushsupporter" who gave my book, Out of Harm's Way, four stars and a favorable review, has been removed from the site. Curious.

I have just checked at approximately 1:30pm Saturday, November 19, and I find at least 33 negative reviews that violate your own rules. In fact, more of them have been posted AFTER you sent me the below email promising they would be blocked.

If these ALL of these reviews which violate your own "review rules" are not down from your Amazon.com site by 7:16 pm Sunday, November 20, then I shall have to proceed accordingly..."

-----------

Pulled from the "gaming politics" community at Livejournal.
I do take umbrage with people who post "author reviews" rather than book/CD/DVD reviews, unless their comment on the author is actually relevant to the work. For example, one negative review I read of Any Given Sunday went into depth about how Oliver Stone's Oliver Stonedom is so awful in the movie. But it's totally on-target and tells you something about the movie. On the other hand, if you take a look at Ashlee Simpson's latest CD you'll see a bunch of worthless one-star reviews from people who wouldn't listen to her stuff if they were paid to--which begs the question, how can they actually review the CD? I'd rather hear from someone who said they listened and thought it was crap, than didn't listen and thought the artist was crap.

That said, Jack's got a bit of a reality problem:
I have just checked at approximately 1:30pm Saturday, November 19, and I find at least 33 negative reviews that violate your own rules. In fact, more of them have been posted AFTER you sent me the below email promising they would be blocked.
Uh, Jack, it's called the real world. It's not like Amazon's review process is sophisticated enough to screen this kind of crap before it goes live, even though reviews do go through a delay. There are too many reviews being added at a time. Probably the best you can expect is a war of attrition until the bogus reviews start to dry up.

Lummox JR
In response to Lummox JR
I suggest that Jack complains and whines and bitches and moans about Amazon's reviews. That'll fix 'um right up!
In response to Lummox JR
Jack Thompson suffers from what I like to call "disassociative reasoning". He doesn't like certain things, so he crusades against them, but his ineptitude at experiencing them (and, indeed, at even bothering to research his facts) prevents him from using common sense. Has Thompson ever played Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas? I can safely say that the answer is almost certainly "No". He seems to rely upon word of mouth and the testimony of evangelical housewives to do his legwork for him.

Why is it that the name "Jack" is always associated with steel-headed nutjobs? Jack Chick, Jack Thompson, Jack the Ripper...
In response to Lummox JR
Lummox JR wrote:
On the other hand, if you take a look at Ashlee Simpson's latest CD you'll see a bunch of worthless one-star reviews from people who wouldn't listen to her stuff if they were paid to

Which annoys the crap out of you when you're buying a present for someone who listens to a different genre to you. I want to know if people who like that sort of music think it's good, not what some disgruntled gothic teenager thinks of the artist. =P

Although I must admit there's something funny about people who think Jack Thompson is a nutjob chasing the guy around trying to flame him at every chance they get.