In response to Soldierman
Soldierman wrote:
no it doesnt, i simply pointing out that the supreme court has no morals, so why would i have to agree with the fact that they say copy infringment is not theft.

Because the difference Copyright infringement and theft is not an argument about morals, but rather law.
In response to Soldierman
But he'll be angry(most likely) because he'll of had life, and you took it. An unborn child has no comprehension of having a life. It won't even know you took it.
In response to Artekia
Isn't this debate just barely touching the forum rules? It'dbe best to dicontinue this discussion and get back on with the real subject. Just my two cents (or since i can just change one word deux cents)
In response to Soldierman
Soldierman wrote:
As your the God-boy comment i wont even waste my time with a rebuttal, cause it was a lame cheap shot, thats all.

And your asking Shades if his real name was Satan was not?
In response to Jon88
Heh. This might go somewhere bad.

Abortion has nothing to do with piracy acts, (Online). Try and leave it at that? =S
My Spiderman abortion-flame-war sense is tingling!

Thread closed.
Page: 1 2 3