1
2
Apr 19 2007, 6:32 am
In response to Jmurph
|
|
He doesn't need to explicitly indicate it, when its obvious that the examples part was sarcastic.
|
In response to Kaioken
|
|
I'm torn. On the one hand, coming from anyone else I would suspect sarcasm. On the other hand, given RJ's attitude, I wouldn't be surprised if that's what he really thinks... =P
|
In response to Kaioken
|
|
The fact that it's sarcasm doesn't really make it any less off-base. Someone can't just get away with saying, "I was just being sarcastic, so you can't point out the flaws in my logic." ;-)
|
In response to SSJ-Chao
|
|
Because the title of it is warning of the DAY, and since they announced it would be a daily warning, the warning writer was robbed of all motivation to do it!
|
1
2