In response to Jmurph
He doesn't need to explicitly indicate it, when its obvious that the examples part was sarcastic.
In response to Kaioken
I'm torn. On the one hand, coming from anyone else I would suspect sarcasm. On the other hand, given RJ's attitude, I wouldn't be surprised if that's what he really thinks... =P
In response to Kaioken
The fact that it's sarcasm doesn't really make it any less off-base. Someone can't just get away with saying, "I was just being sarcastic, so you can't point out the flaws in my logic." ;-)
In response to SSJ-Chao
Because the title of it is warning of the DAY, and since they announced it would be a daily warning, the warning writer was robbed of all motivation to do it!
Page: 1 2