University of Southampton paid $318,760 for their site http://www.soton.ac.uk of which I'd guess $40,000 was for that logo.
What logo? The text?
Plain text is not a logo.
Stephen001 wrote:
University of Southampton paid $318,760 for their site http://www.soton.ac.uk of which I'd guess $40,000 was for that logo. What logo? The text? Plain text is not a logo. |
Vic Rattlehead wrote:
A logo, that much for it? That's just insane... A logo is a good waste of money. Your logo is what everybody will recognize you by. McDonald's paid, I believe, around $200,000 for their "golden arch" logo. Now, anytime someone thinks of gold, arches, or the letter "m", they think of McDonald's. |
UmbrousSoul wrote:
Why waste the money when you can come to me and get it for free or practically nothing? Because some people may want better quality of work for their business. |
Stephen001 wrote:
You're paying to avoid this: http://www.ogc.gov.uk/assets/images_structure/logo_new.gif (Turn it on it's side) Some acronyms are better chosen than others, too. :P |
Its a matter of knowing the acronym or not, That logo just looks like a bland mundane logo to me. Whats so funny?
|
Its a matter of knowing the acronym or not, That logo just looks like a bland mundane logo to me. Whats so funny? I suppose it depends on your sense of humor, but it forms a stick figure in a questionable pose. As Stephen001 instructed, turn the logo 90 degrees clockwise so that the letter C is on the bottom. |
Anyone can write OGC in gold.