ID:178056
 
how can i create a sign which allows users to Tag it, but when read it would still show the Other users Tags on it, so when user A adds "User A was here" to a sign that perviosly said "Welcome" it would say You look at the sign "Welcome","User A was here" by User A"
and so if user B writ "User A is silly" then it would say "Welcome","User A was here" By User A, User A is silly by User B
s this possible, im hopeing its a simple already made byond mini proc
mazarot wrote:
how can i create a sign which allows users to Tag it, but when read it would still show the Other users Tags on it, so when user A adds "User A was here" to a sign that perviosly said "Welcome" it would say You look at the sign "Welcome","User A was here" by User A"
and so if user B writ "User A is silly" then it would say "Welcome","User A was here" By User A, User A is silly by User B
s this possible, im hopeing its a simple already made byond mini proc

There's no simple proc for this, no. But basically any writing to the sign should add to a list, and whenever you look at it it would read from the list.

Lummox JR
In response to Lummox JR
umm, im not good with lists, can yu point me towards a tutorial?
In response to mazarot
obj/Sign
var/Writing = "Welcome" //default text for the sign
Read()
set src in oview(1)
usr << src.Writing //usr << browse(src.Writing) also works
Write(T as msg) //msg is like text, but it's multi-line input
set src in oview(1)
src.Writing += "<br><br>[html_encode(T)]<br><i>written by: [usr.name]</i>" //Adds 1 blank line between messages, and adds their text, without any HTML, then adds their name in itallics on the next line.
Erase()
set src in oview(1)
src.Writing = ""


That SHOULD work, but it isn't tested. Sorry for the long commment there.
In response to Garthor
its not pleased with Write(T as msg) the msg bit
In response to mazarot
mazarot wrote:
its not pleased with Write(T as msg) the msg bitdont worry i gottit ,its message not msg
In response to mazarot
Gah, I always get it confused, number is num and message is message. Why can't DanTom decide to use abbreviations or the whole word? And no, I'm not asking for a reply from Dan or Tom, or any changes to DM.