I dont think this is possible right now but I would like to know if it will be in the future since byond isnt finished yet and still has a ton of room for features. Would it be possible to have verbs work from a variables besides the mobs name like having some kind of verb code that looks like this:
mob/verb
examine(obj/O as O.desc in usr.contents)
usr << "[O.desc] looks like a [O.name]."
that way when you clicked the examine verb you would get a list that showed the desc variables of the objs in your contents instead of their names.
ID:137475
Nov 13 2001, 8:03 am
|
|
In response to Leftley
|
|
In the meantime, a quick workaround would be to leave the verb without arguments, then have it loop through the user's contents and make a list of all the item descriptions from which the user can select via the input() proc. Another way is to create a custom possible values list: proc/InvDescriptions() var/lst[0] for(var/O in contents) lst += O.desc return lst mob/verb/examine(Desc in InvDescriptions()) //blah Of course, if you wanted to find out what the original object was, you would have to loop through the inventory and find an item with a matching description. --Dan |
In response to Dan
|
|
Oh, duh, can't believe I never thought of that. Fortunately, I can't remember any of the things I've ever done that would've needed it, so I can't get really frustrated at myself.
|
In response to Dan
|
|
Hey that's terrific, I can think of a ton of ways to use that! thanks!
|
I believe Dantom is working on some parsing functionality that would allow programmers to do this sort of thing, with a little work. In the meantime, a quick workaround would be to leave the verb without arguments, then have it loop through the user's contents and make a list of all the item descriptions from which the user can select via the input() proc. For players using the verbpanels, the effect would basically be identical--the only real drawback is lack of command-line input/macroing capability.