May 15 2006, 10:17 am
In response to Elation
|
|
Lack of logic eh? If I didn't have logic why am above my year/class standard? Where did a 7B (Perhaps A+ in 6th grade in US Standard, in US form I'll be 4th or 5th) in IT come from, when I'm meant to be 3 numbers behind?
|
In response to RedlineM203
|
|
RedlineM203 wrote:
What I meant is to cut all that code out in one quick addition, not talk about what I can do, because I know and done what I can do to simulate it. Yes, I got that gist last night. Problem is you're trying to redefine basic operations to do fairly obscure one-off things--that would be confusing to other users, and seldom used--that you could do with different code right now. There's just no reason to do that. It makes no sense to hyperspecialize parts of a language. Compacting code is a pretty silly excuse to ask for such features, too. If you're trying to reach a particular goal, either you do it some other way, sacrifice the feature, or find ways to further compress your code to the point where you can add it. Lummox JR |
In response to RedlineM203
|
|
RedlineM203 wrote:
Lack of logic eh? If I didn't have logic why am above my year/class standard? Where did a 7B (Perhaps A+ in 6th grade in US Standard, in US form I'll be 4th or 5th) in IT come from, when I'm meant to be 3 numbers behind? Hahaha. |
In response to Elation
|
|
Elation wrote:
RedlineM203 wrote: I Agree anyone can type complete lies for example. I just finished working with bill gates hes a cool guy. Lol what a load of bull. |