Missing 'in' operator in /operators (reference)

ID:133852 Nov 6 2007, 2:32 pm
Audeuro	The DM reference is missing the 'in' operator in the /operators page. Is this intentional? I mean, it'd be nice to be able to look at where 'in' sits in the Order of Operations, since /operators/in doesn't have such information.

Nov 7 2007, 2:37 pm
Jtgibson	Good point. However, I make a basic assumption: `in` has lowest priority. Always encapsulate all of your `in` calls. E.g., `if(!(obj in src))`, not `if(!obj in src)`.