ID:133094
 Apr 16 2009, 6:51 am (Edited on Apr 16 2009, 6:59 am)
|
|
I suggest a way to show more than one name at the top of a hub as to who made the game. Where it says "by Jim" It could say "by Jim & Joe" and have that hub listed in both of their "My Games" sections. So the second person wouldn't just be a helper, he'd be a second owner.
| |
|
Apr 16 2009, 11:24 am
|
|
Fugsnarf
 |
If the two owners are bickering over who to go first, they're stupid and selfish. for #1, it could have an option as to the order. For #2, it could just take the two options that are listed and put them into the address automatically. Either way, I would perfer the game to be in both of the owner's "My Games" sections.
|
Inuyashaisbest wrote:
1. Whose name would go first, why do their name go first? That's silly. It could list them alphabetically, if the order is really so important. 2. http://www.byond.com/games/who goes here?(/ or .)gamename Ideally, both would keys would have access to the hub, and it could be referenced from either user's hub. I imagine the person that initially creates the hub would be the one that gets to manage other owners' permissions, such as who could manage the hub owners and stuff, so you don't just add someone who removes you from hub ownership; the ability to give other owners this permission should probably stay though, so ownership could be transferred if needed. This is something I'd support, but obviously isn't a big enough issue to require immediate implementation. | |
I think this is a horrible idea. Not only are there already Helper settings as mentioned, but people will horribly abuse this system; claiming that popular game developers helped them make their crappy little rip just to get more attention.
| |
Not necessarily. If the two people are in full agreement that they both should be listed as true complete owners of the game, you'd have it as such. You could have a system which notifies the other person if they desire to be added as a complete owner. If they never answer or deny, they won't be listed. Simple solution.
| |
Fugsnarf wrote:
Not necessarily. If the two people are in full agreement that they both should be listed as true complete owners of the game, you'd have it as such. You could have a system which notifies the other person if they desire to be added as a complete owner. If they never answer or deny, they won't be listed. Simple solution. If there was a system to auto-deny, or if it wasn't displayed until after you accepted; then that could work. But from what I know of the BYOND staff, they're either unwilling or incapable of creating competent systems like that. | |
I'm sure they could do that. It doesn't seem like something that difficult to create. An auto-deny system would be nice for that as well, though, for those people might have alot of noobs with rips of their games.
| |
Fugsnarf wrote:
I'm sure they could do that. It doesn't seem like something that difficult to create. An auto-deny system would be nice for that as well, though, for those people might have alot of noobs with rips of their games. There could just as easily be an auto-accept. Or those people with 1000 rips of their source would just have to manually accept everything. Though really, how often do the noob rippers even give credit? More often than not they claim the game is 100% original. | |
This could easily require a joint effort in other to confirm the adding of another owner in order to eliminate that problem. That is to say, require the person being added to confirm he wishes to be before the change is in effect. A good addition would also be to allow such a person to later remove himself, if wanted, as part of his added permissions to the hub entry.
| |