I found an interesting link at spacedaily.com today. Apparently the planetoid Sedna, a Pluto-type Kuiper belt object, may be explained by a second star in the solar system. The hypothesis that the sun might be part of a binary system isn't new, but this is the first good evidence in its favor for a long time. Sedna's orbit reportedly fits pretty closely with the orbit expected of a theoretical second star, but is not very well explained by other forces. If such a star exists, it must surely be a red or brown dwarf, since it has never been seen. It can't be a black hole, which would have been much much easier to spot, unless said black hole is quiescent right now. (There's a cheery thought, huh?)
The other star, if it exists, would be named Nemesis. It's just a theory for now, but if it exists, future star- and planet-finding projects may detect it. Barnard's star, just under 6 light-years from us, is a red dwarf that's very dim, but was detected due to its motion relative to other stars. If a star that close can be missed, then one that's 1 to 1.5 light-years away could also escape detection if it's a similar or dimmer model. Nemesis was first proposed to explain what were thought to be periodic mass-extinctions, caused by perturbation of the Oort cloud that sent comets hurtling inward toward the inner planets; other theories suggest no such periodic timetable ever existed, or that the sun crossing the galactic plane could have the same effect.
When looking up binary stars on Wikipedia, I discovered another interesting fact. In a related link, astronomers hypothesize based on computer models that terrestrial planets may be more common in binary systems. However that story is looking at models of binaries that have up to maybe 12, 15 AU separation between them at most. Nemesis is suggested to be about 50,000 to 100,000 AU away from the sun. One does wonder, though, if it would have a unique impact on planetary formation or orbital stability that might explain why Earth has a nearly circular orbit.
Also in the story on Sedna, it's mentioned that the recently discovered Kuiper belt object UB313 (sometimes called "Xena" while it's awaiting a more official name) is bigger than Pluto. I discovered elsewhere that its potential status as a 10th planet is under debate. Its official name may end up being Lila. A proposed name for its moon is Gabrielle. Apparently in the rush of new objects detected by early astronomy, all the Greco-Roman god names were taken, leaving us with Geoff the god of biscuits and Simon the god of hairdos.
ID:11692
Apr 26 2006, 6:24 pm
|
|
Planets really aren't well-defined enough. Most definitions we're coming up with today either exclude Pluto, or include two to three KBOs.
Incidentally, Pluto is now known to have three moons. Sexy. |
I vote Joxer.
I'd vote Ares in honor of the late Kevin Smith if we didn't already have Mars. I love the lightning dice throw. ;) |
Welcome to Fonz Prime II. Home of the hairgel monsters.
Anywho, that is really interesting. We really should put more effort into looking at our own solarsystem before we move out into the rest. |
You forgot Kyamites, god of beans (We actually have a Byond member by that name, too).
The existance of another brown dwarf further out in the system is very intriguing. Perhaps that would explain the Kuiper belt, much in the same way Jupiter is thought to have prevented the formation of a planet in the asteriod belt. [Edit: However, after reading the Wikipedia article, it is clear that this object is to far beyond the Oort cloud to be a likely explaination.] I think calling brown dwarves "stars" is a misnomer. A star performs nuclear fusion. If we are to classify these 'failed stars' as stars, how are we to classify Jupiter, with moons larger than Mercury? |
I'd frankly be surprised if there wasn't an asteroid named Bacchus.
Regarding the Kuiper belt formation, mind that the Oort cloud is supposed to be about a light-year out. In fact the Wikipedia article says it's about 50,000 to 100,000 AU distant from the sun. That'd put Nemesis right in the neighborhood. Sedna is the only known object that may belong to the Oort cloud, because of its highly eccentric orbit. If it is an Oort object, then the cloud may extend much further inward than was previously thought. Interestingly while reading about the Oort cloud I learned about Gliese 710, a red dwarf 63 light-years away, whose orbit will eventually (very eventually) put it within 1.1 light-years of the sun. Freaky! |
The thought of life exites me!
How cool would it be to find another intelligent being? Be it some sort of weird dog, or a monkey who can do calculus... I would love to know that we are not alone. |
Wrong topic, Boid. I'm referring to the possibility of another star in this system, not to intelligent life. Or even literate life; we should be so lucky.
|
I'd frankly be surprised if there wasn't an asteroid named Bacchus. Apparently there is: Bacchus on German Wikipedia |
(oh and i'd definitely go with Geoff of biscuit :D )