<!--
For the past couple weeks I've been using the new HTML5 features to try and implement a rudimentary video game engine. Currently there's nothing too big in it, and I've pretty much just got some basic event handling and have it drawing to the screen. For the sake of testing it out, I'd like to get a rough idea of how well different computers handle what I've got so far. To do so, please run the file here (may take a few seconds to load), and let it run until the Status portion says, "Status: Game loop shut down.". It should take thirty seconds from after the game loop starts (which isn't right away). After that, please leave a comment with the following info:
Average FPS
Browser (including the version info)
Hardware specs, such as RAM, CPU, GPU, etc. Anything sound-related shouldn't be relevant.
Thanks a ton.
[Edit]
Also, preferably, please don't have anything else but the browser running while testing this. It may influence the result.
-->
NOPE.
ID:109558
 Feb 14 2011, 7:20 pm (Edited on Mar 24 2012, 3:40 pm)
|
|
12.74fps
Firefox 4b11 4GB RAM, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 AMD Turion II 2.2GHz dual core | |
Average frames-per-second: 9.000
Browser: Firefox 3.6.13 Hardware specs: CPU - Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 2.40GHz RAM - 4GB GPU - Mobile Intel 4 Series Express Chipset Family | |
Frames-per-second: 27
Average frames-per-second: 28.50 Browser: Chrome 9.0.597.87 Processor: AMD Athlon II Dual-Core M300 ~2.0GHz Memory: 3072MB RAM Video: AMD M860G with ATI Mobility Radeon 4100, 1GB RAM | |
After some discussion, I have produced a new version with a better framerate, and consistently higher one across browsers. If you wish to contribute, that can be found here.
| |
Two pieces of data for you.
Using the link in the comment section: Frames-per-second: 26 Average frames-per-second: 20.96 Browser: Firefox 3.6.13 OS: XP Professional 2002 SP2 uP: Core Duo T7200 @ 2.0GHz RAM: 2.0 GB DDR2 Graphics: ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Frames-per-second: 6 Average frames-per-second: 5.930 Browser: Safari OS: iOS 4.0 uP/RAM/Graphics: iPhone 3GS | |
Popisfizzy wrote:
After some discussion, I have produced a new version with a better framerate, and consistently higher one across browsers. If you wish to contribute, that can be found here. After three minutes I closed this tab, as the status simply stayed at "Drawing Screen". Though it had a far better framerate as stated. -- In the original test: Iterations: 433 Frames-per-second: 16 Average frames-per-second: 14.40 Total objects in view: 1682 Total objects in world: 62500 Total tiles in view: 1681 Total tiles in world: 62500 Windows 7 Ultimate 4-bit. AMD Phenom II 1090T Processor (6 CPUs), ~3.2GHz Memory: 8192MB DDR3 RAM. ATI Radeon HD 5800Series 996MB Approx RAM. Firefox 3.6.13 | |
Popisfizzy wrote:
After some discussion, I have produced a new version with a better framerate, and consistently higher one across browsers. If you wish to contribute, that can be found here. At 580 seconds I got sick of waiting. 50 FPS seemed to be the cap :( Frames-per-second: 50 Average frames-per-second: 49.58 Browser: Chrome 9.0.597.58 OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit CPU: Core i5-2500K (4 cores) @ ~4.2GHz RAM: 8.0 GB DDR3 Graphics: ATI Radeon HD 6970 2GB | |
Frames-per-second: 50
Average frames-per-second: 47.00 Browser: Firefox 4 Beta 11 OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit CPU: AMD Phenom II 940 X4 3 GHz RAM: 8 GB DDR2 GPU: AMD Radeon HD 6950 2 GB | |
Frames-Per-Second: 25
Average frames-per-second: 26.66 Browser: Chrome 9.0.597.87 Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 ~2.0 GHz Memory: 4096 MB RAM Video: Nvidia GeForce 9300 M, 512 MB RAM | |
Tiberath wrote:
After three minutes I closed this tab, as the status simply stayed at "Drawing Screen". Though it had a far better framerate as stated. Murrawhip wrote: At 580 seconds I got sick of waiting. Ack, sorry. Yeah, I changed it to ten minutes to test something else out, and forgot to revert it. I'll do that now. :S | |
Why are other peoples' computers so much better than mine?
| |
Popisfizzy wrote:
After some discussion, I have produced a new version with a better framerate, and consistently higher one across browsers. If you wish to contribute, that can be found here. Frames-per-second: 47 Average frames-per-second: 47.72 I would eventually get it up to 50FPS in a couple of iterations, but yeah, not the average. | |
Average FPS: 15
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 1.5 Ghz Browser: Firefox 4.0 Beta 11 Video: Some outdated Intel chipset RAM: 2GB OS: Vista EDIT: Also, I had 2 other tabs open at the time | |
Popisfizzy wrote:
After some discussion, I have produced a new version with a better framerate, and consistently higher one across browsers. If you wish to contribute, that can be found here. Iterations: 896 Frames-per-second: 32 Average frames-per-second: 29.83 See below for PC specs. | |
Average frames-per-second: 38.69
OS: Windows 7 Browser: Chrome 9.0.597.98 Ram: 2GB CPU: 1.83GHZ Centrino 2 cores GPU: Nvidia 86000M GT | |
Browser: Firefox v3.6.13
Average frames-per-second: 8.800
Browser: Chrome 9.0.597.98
Average frames-per-second: 35.17
Hardware:
RAM: 4gb
Processor: 3.16ghz Dual Core
Video card: nvidia - GTX 280