In response to LexyBitch
Lexy unless you are hoping to educate others, don't waste breath on this guy.

Anyone who can't understand how HTML could be applied to games doesn't have the mental capacity to appreciate the finer points of genetics!

Well I'm on to making games. Mr Water can go read more comic book adaptions of genetics texts.
In response to Deadron
On 7/20/01 1:07 am Deadron wrote:
Lexy unless you are hoping to educate others, don't waste breath on this guy.

Anyone who can't understand how HTML could be applied to games doesn't have the mental capacity to appreciate the finer points of genetics!

Well I'm on to making games. Mr Water can go read more comic book adaptions of genetics texts.

You're right. My rational for righting it was that if what he wrote was allowed to stand on its own, without the obvious flaws pointed out, it might strike a chord with others who are undecided on the matter and do some damage... but in retrospect, why am I worried about someone who can't even count to 5 swaying anyone's opinion?
In response to Ebonshadow
On 7/19/01 9:30 pm Ebonshadow wrote:
cut...
I disagree with this. I dont like the way fish tastes. Theres know way anybody is ever gonna change this unless they can make fish taste like pizza. Theres no way I could just all the sudden start liking fish. Just because you prefer something over another, doesn't mean you can change what you prefer. You can begin to prefer something else, but you cant force yourself to prefer something else. Your trying to make it sound like if a gay person wanted to, he could just suddenlt turn straight and start like women. You cannot force yourself to like something. Its as simple as that.

Nothing has ever prove Homosexuality as a preference or a genentic trait...
In response to sunzoner
On the issue of sexuality/gender, the problem is with the old method of classifing human. Why are there only ,ale or female?
I believe that there was a study in ?US/France?, that state that human should be classify into more than 2 to accomodate their differences in sexuality/gender.
I have forgotten if its gender or sexuality...

Gender.

I believe the distinctions are the following:
- male
- female
- hermaphrodite
- mermaphrodite
- fermaphrodite

Though I do know the differences between them, I'd rather not get into details.
In response to Lord of Water
On 7/19/01 5:15 pm Lord of Water wrote:
My problem with what she said is that I detest homosexuality. I consider it vile and disgusting, and homosexuals go into my book as morally lower than others.

I beleive in a no-homo world.

You can say NO to homosexuality.

it might be the shovinistic pig in me talking.. but i have no problem at all with lasbains.

ok it was a joke. (but true ;)
In response to jobe

it might be the shovinistic pig in me talking.. but i have no problem at all with lasbains.

I don't count as a problem?

-pouts-
In response to LexyBitch
On 7/19/01 6:17 pm LexyBitch wrote:
If the others want to argue with you, they can go ahead. I won't. When I correct someone for saying "That's gay," it's because they're ignorant, and my goal in life is the removal of ignorance. But you know what? I have no argument against honest evil.

Ok, just to let others know, Dose anyone actuall know what a "faggot" is? its a bundle of brush used to start a fire. so when i add an item called a faggot to my game... i dont expect anyone to go apeshit or make jokes about it. thanks.

(HISTORY! the word faggot was given to homosexuals in Nazi Germony(ok i cant spell.. shutup;). the Nazis used a bunch of homosexuals tied together to start there bonfires. the really sick thing is they would cook there food over it befor all the human was burned away..)
In response to Ebonshadow
On 7/19/01 5:42 pm Ebonshadow wrote:
On 7/19/01 5:15 pm Lord of Water wrote:
My problem with what she said is that I detest homosexuality. I consider it vile and disgusting, and homosexuals go into my book as morally lower than others.

I beleive in a no-homo world.

That sounds familiar... Didn't hitler believe in something similar?

You can say NO to homosexuality.

I dont think there is anything wrong with it as long as im not apart of it. I don't agree with it, but as long as it doesn't hurt me I really dont care.
"You can say NO to homosexuality."

You trying to change somebody from gay to straight would be just like them trying to make you gay. You make it sound like drugs. I really doubt people are peer-pressured into being gay. What it comes down to is it is really just persons personal preference. You should not have to change your personal preference because somebody disagrees with it.
Actually I dont think its possible to change your personal preference on your own. I couldn't just change my favorite color to red when I know it's green.

did you know.

did you know that there are drugs to change your sexual preferance? it has been shown that peaple can actually "turn" homosexual after a number of years being straight. These durgs are not being force on anyone mind you(as it should be). but there are men and women who turn gay after a number of years in marrage or the lifestyle they perfer. These man and women rather take drugs to change themselves to the lifestyle they have chosen instead of changeing there lifestyle.
In response to sunzoner
On 7/20/01 6:45 am sunzoner wrote:
On 7/19/01 9:30 pm Ebonshadow wrote:
cut...
I disagree with this. I dont like the way fish tastes. Theres know way anybody is ever gonna change this unless they can make fish taste like pizza. Theres no way I could just all the sudden start liking fish. Just because you prefer something over another, doesn't mean you can change what you prefer. You can begin to prefer something else, but you cant force yourself to prefer something else. Your trying to make it sound like if a gay person wanted to, he could just suddenlt turn straight and start like women. You cannot force yourself to like something. Its as simple as that.

Nothing has ever prove Homosexuality as a preference or a genentic trait...

your wrong. read my "Jobe's Did you know"
In response to jobe
(HISTORY! the word faggot was given to homosexuals in Nazi Germony(ok i cant spell.. shutup;). the Nazis used a bunch of homosexuals tied together to start there bonfires. the really sick thing is they would cook there food over it befor all the human was burned away..)

Um... I've seen references to this use of this word in this fashion that predate Nazism. Also, the Nazis would've used a German word. Despite what Hollywood has taught us, German people really do speak German, not just heavily accented English.

Also... while true Nazi atrocities mean it's easy to believe any Nazi horror story you hear, I wouldn't buy this one. If they were obsessed about their own purity, I doubt they'd eat something roasted over the bodies of the impure.
In response to jobe

Nothing has ever prove Homosexuality as a preference or a genentic trait...

your wrong. read my "Jobe's Did you know"

Your "Did you know", aside from being wrong, doesn't have anything to do with prove of it being a preference or a genetic trait.

I wonder what these mythical drugs might be. Even things like male and female hormonal supplements will not change someone's preferences. If that doesn't do it, what would?
In response to LexyBitch
On 7/20/01 6:01 pm LexyBitch wrote:
(HISTORY! the word faggot was given to homosexuals in Nazi Germony(ok i cant spell.. shutup;). the Nazis used a bunch of homosexuals tied together to start there bonfires. the really sick thing is they would cook there food over it befor all the human was burned away..)

Um... I've seen references to this use of this word in this fashion that predate Nazism. Also, the Nazis would've used a German word. Despite what Hollywood has taught us, German people really do speak German, not just heavily accented English.

Also... while true Nazi atrocities mean it's easy to believe any Nazi horror story you hear, I wouldn't buy this one. If they were obsessed about their own purity, I doubt they'd eat something roasted over the bodies of the impure.

perhaps it was someone else. but the fact that the name was given becase they were being burned like faggots. (and who is to say faggot is an english word? hell most of our words origiante from other langs.)
In response to LexyBitch
On 7/20/01 6:05 pm LexyBitch wrote:
Nothing has ever prove Homosexuality as a preference or a genentic trait...

your wrong. read my "Jobe's Did you know"

Your "Did you know", aside from being wrong, doesn't have anything to do with prove of it being a preference or a genetic trait.

I wonder what these mythical drugs might be. Even things like male and female hormonal supplements will not change someone's preferences. If that doesn't do it, what would?

i did not mean it was for ALL homosexuality. i said it was for men and women who became gay well into there life.

In response to jobe

perhaps it was someone else. (and who is to say faggot is an english word? hell most of our words origiante from other langs.)

It sure as heck ain't no German word. Where ever it came from, it's been in English for centuries.

but the fact that the name was given becase they were being burned like faggots.

Where exactly did you learn this "fact" from? I've always assumed that the word was a take-off from the fact that gay men are characterized as "flamboyant" (i.e., flaming.)
In response to LexyBitch
On 7/20/01 6:15 pm LexyBitch wrote:
but the fact that the name was given becase they were being burned like faggots.

Where exactly did you learn this "fact" from? I've always assumed that the word was a take-off from the fact that gay men are characterized as "flamboyant" (i.e., flaming.)

It's an old myth. It's not accurate, though I too thought it was once.
In response to Deadron
On 7/20/01 6:29 pm Deadron wrote:
On 7/20/01 6:15 pm LexyBitch wrote:
but the fact that the name was given becase they were being burned like faggots.

Where exactly did you learn this "fact" from? I've always assumed that the word was a take-off from the fact that gay men are characterized as "flamboyant" (i.e., flaming.)

It's an old myth. It's not accurate, though I too thought it was once.

Which is? The tying-and-burning, or the flamboyancy thing? My reasoning is it's a natural hyperbole... "Look at that Lord Chesterdown again, he couldn't be any more flaming if her were a..."
In response to LexyBitch
On 7/20/01 6:32 pm LexyBitch wrote:
On 7/20/01 6:29 pm Deadron wrote:
On 7/20/01 6:15 pm LexyBitch wrote:
but the fact that the name was given becase they were being burned like faggots.

Where exactly did you learn this "fact" from? I've always assumed that the word was a take-off from the fact that gay men are characterized as "flamboyant" (i.e., flaming.)

It's an old myth. It's not accurate, though I too thought it was once.

Which is? The tying-and-burning, or the flamboyancy thing? My reasoning is it's a natural hyperbole... "Look at that Lord Chesterdown again, he couldn't be any more flaming if her were a..."

The burning as source of terminology.
Could people please stop responding to this, you're hogging the forum.
In response to XgavinX
Hmmmmm.... I don't want to sound like I'm sucking up. But even though Lexy's gave me a "somewhat" scolding for making a DBZ Mud, I still respect Lexy. Hmmmm.... it sounds like I'm sucking up. .... .... .... Odd..... I forgot what I was gonna say. Oh well *walks away*
In response to Ronn
actually, your not really sucking up,
me and lexy got into a huge argument one time,
and the next day, she talked to me and treated me as a normal person, not mad at me in any way.

this is why i like lexy, she does not judge you based on your opinions, i am like that SOMETIMES, basically if you disagree on something that i dont like, i will respect your decision/opinion, but i we will then have less to talk about since we dont agree on that thing/topic

now dont get me wrong, im sure if i said something to the effect:
"LEXY SUCKS"
she would hate me somewhat(arguable), but i think she is cool person.

and i also might add, that is fairly easy to get onto lexy's nerves, i have been there

FIREking
Page: 1 2 3 4 5