In response to Dareb
Dareb wrote:
I hear you making replies to everything i said, but i cant. (HEAR) you. your not making a point with your statements, which means you are to be overlooked

It's obvious you can't hear him. You shut out any logical refutation to your arguments. He's made plenty of points, which is in direct contrast to yourself.
In response to Skysaw
well thats your opinion.
In response to Dareb
Lexy isnt a "Hate Filled person" she is just cranky... Alot... If ya catch her in a good mood she is quite pleasent to be around ^^
In response to Jacro
Im a fridge, shes a magnet.
In response to Dareb
0.o What am I?
In response to Dareb
Dareb wrote:

true, sometimes violence is the only option.
when people just wont listen is pretty much the only time.

I hear you making replies to everything i said, but i cant. (HEAR) you.

So, what point does the above statements, made by yourself, make?
In response to Dareb
If that's to infer that Lexy is attracted to you, then (even if you were her type) you really have a warped sense of reality!
In response to Dareb
Dareb: "Beat the [snot] out of anyone who deserves it."

Lexy: "Violence isn't the answer."

Yep. Hate-filled is the term that perfectly describes one person in this conversation.

Anyway, you're still doing it... not-so-artfully dodging the point. You couldn't argue against anything Xooxer or I actually said, so you made up an argument about criminalizing violence and "debunked" that one instead. You got caught doing that, so instead of presenting any sort of case, now you're ignoring the argument entirely and just attacking me. If this doesn't work, are you going to pull the fire alarm and run for the exits? Maybe you could claim a mod's been editing your posts to make you look bad and then denounce everyone who calls you a liar. Again. Whenever your side of an argument starts to go so far south that even your superhuman stubbornness can't sustain it, you pull out the distractions.
In response to Dog Man
No matter what, if he follows her, its stalking, which is against the law.

(Well, it is over here in England, anyway.)
In response to Xooxer
The only time violence would be considered justified is if it would prevent loss of life.

Does this mean it would not be justifiable to use force to stop a rape or a burglary?
In response to Gughunter
I didn't say anything about force. ;)
In response to Soccerguy13
Ahh sitting on the job am I?hehe.I acctually get to make 36 dollars instead of 30.
In response to Xooxer
sorry im taken

In response to Dareb
Dareb wrote:
sorry im taken


My condolences to the takee.

~X
In response to Xooxer
That was well beyond the realm of humour
In response to Dareb
dont you mean "Byond" the realm of humour...


(Highlight)>><font color=black>Lol.. that was sooo lame...</font color=black>
In response to Dareb
I thought it was rather clever too. Thanx for the compliment. :)

~X
Page: 1 2 3 4