I'm not so much concerned about configuring the keyboard as switching between typing methods. Some kinds of learning are easy to swap -- for example, you can alternate between walking, roller-skating, and riding a bike without needing to re-acclimate yourself whenever you switch modes of transportation. But if you switch between, say, a DOS command line, a UNIX command line, and a VMS command line, it's pretty easy to forget the environment you're in and use the command that's most familiar to you.
Gughunter wrote:
I'm not so much concerned about configuring the keyboard as switching between typing methods. Some kinds of learning are easy to swap -- for example, you can alternate between walking, roller-skating, and riding a bike without needing to re-acclimate yourself whenever you switch modes of transportation. But if you switch between, say, a DOS command line, a UNIX command line, and a VMS command line, it's pretty easy to forget the environment you're in and use the command that's most familiar to you. It might be easier than you think... probably more along the lines of speaking two different languages, and switching back and forth. As long as you keep practicing them both, this is not a big deal. |
Dareb wrote:
because I can write at an equally incredible speed whether or not i look at the keyboard Of course, you don't even need a keyboard to write, since you write on paper. And, you're not a "typist" if you look at the keys, you're just a fast typer. A typist is someone that can type with very little flaw at decent speeds without looking at the keys. |
Nadrew wrote:
Dareb wrote: Here's a standard definition that may clear up his statement: Incredible: So implausible as to elicit disbelief Yup. Incredible. |
Yes, I type incredibly fast, and incredibly accurate at it aswell.
Im quick to repair any mistakes I make, and damn, im way ahead of the rest of these people. |
Dareb wrote:
Yes, I type incredibly fast, and incredibly accurate at it aswell. That lack of a space would claim otherwise. |
Spuzzum wrote:
Dareb wrote: Not to mention the missing ' in I'm in the next sentence... =) |
digitalmouse wrote:
Not to mention the missing ' in I'm in the next sentence... =) Not once, but twice... And a non-capitalized "i" in the second instance... |
I dont know whats in your eyes, but there is no missing space.
And I rarely ever put apostrophes in. I stated that I was quick and accurate, not that Im a grammar freak OR that I communicate clearly. |
Dareb wrote:
I dont know whats in your eyes, but there is no missing space. "Yes, I type incredibly fast, and incredibly accurate at it <font color=yellow>aswell.</font>" I didn't have any trouble spotting it. And I rarely ever put apostrophes in. I stated that I was quick and accurate, not that Im a grammar freak OR that I communicate clearly. Accuracy includes correct apostrophes, capitalization, and spelling. Anything else is known as a "typo." |
Yes, I type incredibly fast, and incredibly accurate at it aswell. No space... Digitalmouse was correct... And the very essence of "accuracy" in typing is proper spelling and grammar... Leaving out apostrophes definitely is not accurate... Therefore, you are not accurate... Quick, maybe, but not accurate... |
Dareb wrote:
you damn idiot, aswell is a word. Here we go again. Dareb, you really ought to check your facts before hitting the post button. Once again, you are inventing language, and once again, you look foolish. "aswell" is not a word. "as" and "well" are two words, however. |
Dareb wrote:
aswell is one word OR two words. Show me a dictionary that has that entry, and earn yourself 100 dimes. and accuracy has nothing to do with grammar or punctuation. This attitude will have you fail a typing test. No soup for you! |
because I can write at an equally incredible speed whether or not i look at the keyboard