IQ tests dont measure knowledge, its more of your ability to learn, to grasp concepts, and to rationalize things that you dont know, but theres a pattern that will let you figure it out.
|
Kunark wrote:
IQ test seems to be kind of crappy at scoring IQ if you got 121... It must be turned off. :P I got a 129. Alot of them I mis-read, like the 'Who's the shortest' one. I thought it said tallest. Most people my age get about a 90 (or at least my friends did.). Man, your friends must be <S>retar</s> special. ~>Volte |
Here's my definition of intelligence quotient:
Inteligence Quotient: The measure of one's ability to learn by detecting and learning patterns. Now here's World's Worlds: Inteligence Quotient: The ability to see if games are working from their IP address and the 'ping' command But then, Worlds is an uneducated computer program designed to do just that. And yes, I do try to put a 'Worlds' bit in every post. |
90 is the average for teenagers around my age.
You don't seem to get that this test is WAY off, along with most other tests online. 130 is GENIOUS! You know, Einstine? |
Buzzyboy wrote:
OneFishDown probably scored a 6 and got mad :P Hehe, I'd actually be proud of myself if I got a 6, because if you answer all of them wrong it says that your IQ is about 36. I forget what I got exactly, because I know its not very accurate. But, if you're wondering, it was somewhere around 130. |
Foomer wrote:
I don't understand this question: "What is the result of multiplying all figures from 0 to 25?" Whatever the heck that meant, I got it right. :P It's a trick question. You are supposed to think it's 25 factorial. 25 * 24 * 23 * 22 * 21 * 20 * 19 * 18 ... But factorial is all figures 1 to 25, not 0 to 25... 0 times anything is 0! So the result of multiplying all figures 0 to 25 is 0. |
Perhaps you're thinking of a blue heron. Or perhaps this post is just a red herring!