![]() Jun 29 2005, 1:11 am
In response to Shades
|
|
Hey, it would fix the problem with the low recruitment rates in the armed forces.
|
I saw Sean of the Dead but I didn't really like it. Perhaps cultural barriers? :P, IMO I think it was from how a big part of it was on Sean's life and not the zombies until about the last 1/3 of the movie. Kinda diulted the action I was hoping for. There were a lot of funny parts with how absurdly they handled the zombies.
|
Did you hear about that labratory making zombie dogs (Honest to God, i'm not kidding. Kinda off topic though)
|
EGUY wrote:
I saw Sean of the Dead but I didn't really like it. Perhaps cultural barriers? :P, IMO I think it was from how a big part of it was on Sean's life and not the zombies until about the last 1/3 of the movie. The zombies were there from pretty much the start! |
Nice summary, but there is no "Night of the Living Dead 2"... there is "Return of the Living Dead" 2 and 3, though. Again, both serieses are sequels to Night of the Living Dead. Romero and the Return Guy (don't remember his name) split the rights down the middle, including the rights to the name. Romero got to keep the "Night" part of the motif (night goes into dawn, dawn into day)... the other guy got the right to use "Living Dead" in his movie title.
There is no explanation of the zombies in Dawn/Day/Land -because- it was already explained in Night. |