Bleach: Las Noches

by Ozodbek1995
Bleach: Las Noches
Version 7.0 and Improved Training
ID:984708
 
Okay, now I noticed a link to this game in another game's(Heroes United) forums... now, while I was curious to know why someone would be idiotic enough to advertise in Falacy's game... I decided to click the link. First thing I see, a description with no truth. The game was created not even a week ago, how could Berlin have stolen your source code? Oh, and... the source was updated, quite a bit. The original source also had proper grammar in it, which you seem to lack... so, that goes into my folder of evidence that this game is nothing, but a R.I.P.

Not RIP, but as in "Rest In Peace"... 'cause this game is going to have one the lowest player bases that BYOND can offer.
1st of all you know the R3dFand is my bro!! second of all NNF never worked with NNG. NNG just took nnf and added some stuff, And NNG has alot of bugs which R3dFang made when he was leaving!!! so...............
I don't care. The game uses proper grammar, which you haven't shown. I never said, that this game worked with NNG.. however, it's quite obvious that the description is a lie. Also, NNG's source was released... so, that makes it even more plausible for this to be untrue. So many things point to this game being a Rip of Berlin's NNG and, the description being full of lies. If you have proof to prove me wrong, then please post it. I would like to see it.^^
lol, you are? First of all, this was NNG Source, that I modified. Second of all, I did worked with Berlin on 2.0 but that was after NNF.
Lucky me you don't have the latest source of NNF, only Berlin has it.
In response to R3d Fang
R3d Fang wrote:
lol, you are? First of all, this was NNG Source, that I modified. Second of all, I did worked with Berlin on 2.0 but that was after NNF.
Lucky me you don't have the latest source of NNF, only Berlin has it.

Thank you, that basically just proves my point. (:
That's a cute description you got there, couldn't be more of a lie, but it's cute.
In response to SinfulPhoenix
SinfulPhoenix wrote:
That's a cute description you got there, couldn't be more of a lie, but it's cute.


I know, right? I actually thought it was hilarious that someone would even attempt to lie about that.
Deadlypure wrote:
Zane5494 your funny man why would u talk shit about another game if u havent even played so stfu and atleast the owner could make this game u prob cant even icon or code u noob

The thing is, the owner didn't make this game.
Deadlypure wrote:
Zane5494 your funny man why would u talk shit about another game if u havent even played so stfu and atleast the owner could make this game u prob cant even icon or code u noob

Actually, I have made games and I can code. You're right about me not being very good at graphics, but I can guarantee that I can program circles around you, and the so called "owner" with no skill in game development. Also, noob? The fact that you still refer to this impostor as the owner, and your obvious illiteracy... aren't you the noob here?
Lol.
Deadlypure wrote:
Idk man why dont u tell me smart guy

My point has been proven.
Deadlypure=Noob.
Facts are facts.
hm? Well, obviously you do... since, you even bothered to make such a pointless and idiotic commment as your first one.