just realized... i havent been that nice lately, huh?
i'm sorry ;x theres been so much stress around here lately, i'd rather not talk about it... so yeah :X
sorry~
ID:277836
May 11 2008, 7:55 am
|
|
May 11 2008, 8:05 am
|
|
Who are you?
|
In response to Repiv
|
|
Repiv wrote:
Who are you?...read my keyname. i guess you can call me an intermediate coder? |
In response to Eternal Desire
|
|
Internewbiate at best, actually.
|
This is asking for trouble in my opinion. It would probably be better to forget the whole thing, lay low, and make an epic game. It's the only way to recover those lost karma points.
|
In response to Silicon Viking
|
|
Silicon Viking wrote:
This is asking for trouble in my opinion. It would probably be better to forget the whole thing, lay low, and make an epic game. It's the only way to recover those lost karma points.you kinda need help for random errors, even experienced people get errors. |
In response to Popisfizzy
|
|
Popisfizzy wrote:
Internewbiate at best, actually. You're forgetting that people who call themselves a "coder" are inherently newbie, since a coder is a lower class than a programmer. An intermediate coder is roughly the equivalent of a very newbie programmer. |
In response to Foomer
|
|
You're forgetting that strictly-speaking, out of common slang, a coder has nothing to do with programming. And in common slang however, it has the same meaning as 'programmer'.
|
In response to Kaioken
|
|
Kaioken wrote:
You're forgetting that strictly-speaking, out of common slang, a coder has nothing to do with programming. And in common slang however, it has the same meaning as 'programmer'. I think Foomer's point is that if someone is using the term "coder" to describe themselves, it means they're only a newbie. A real programmer would never call themselves a coder. It's kinda like a cable guy calling himself a wiring monkey. Lummox JR |
In response to Lummox JR
|
|
Lummox JR wrote:
A real programmer would never call themselves a coder. It's kinda like a cable guy calling himself a wiring monkey. I have to disagree there; from what I have seen and heard, "coder" in English means the same as "programmer", except it takes fewer letters to type and has become a habit to use on BYOND. English is my second language, and I have never heard of any true distinction between "coder" and "programmer". There have been people shunning me because of it, which I do not understand. As such, the reason I disagree is because non-native English speakers haven't been taken into consideration here. -- Data |
In response to Android Data
|
|
"Coder" referring to programmer is slang, pure and simple, and the only reason it's a habit is because people ignorantly think that it's the proper word to use (the same reason that "iconer" is so !&$#% prevalent).
Any native English speaker will tell you this unless they don't know any better. There are a lot of stupid people, sadly. |
In response to Lummox JR
|
|
Lummox JR wrote:
A real programmer would never call themselves a coder. I have to disagree here. Being skilled/"real"/whatever you want doesn't mean you're never going to use slang. You're still gonna use it a lot like everyone else, even if a little less than them perhaps. It's kinda like a cable guy calling himself a wiring monkey. You've got a nice example there, so I'm going to use and fix your sentence at the same time. It's kind like a cable guy calling himself a cable guy. There you go. It's slang, and you've used it too (oh ha_ha). Not that "cable guys" necessarily call themselves that (I wouldn't really know since where I live English isn't the main language), but I do doubt they always call themselves the most technically correct definition. |
In response to Android Data
|
|
Android Data wrote:
I have to disagree there; from what I have seen and heard, "coder" in English means the same as "programmer", except it takes fewer letters to type and has become a habit to use on BYOND. "Coder" is not equivalent to "programmer" in English; it is however understandable to see how someone who does not speak it natively wouldn't know that. But, not knowing that is basically nothing unusual for non-programmers regardless--it's in common use on BYOND precisely because the folks using the term don't know any better. English is my second language, and I have never heard of any true distinction between "coder" and "programmer". There have been people shunning me because of it, which I do not understand. In Chasing Amy (a movie I actually don't like much) there's a bit in the beginning where two comic book artists are at a convention. Someone asks what their roles are in the team, and one of them says he inks in the lines. "Oh, you're a tracer," says the fan. The artist objects to this term, but it spreads around the crowd: He's just a tracer. He's nobody. The term "coder", where it can be applied to programming at all, connotes a lack of skill or knowledge, just basically plopping code into a box and letting it go. In the movie, the "tracer" is implied not to be an artist in his own right, just a guy who does grunt work for the real creative genius. Programming is a high art, so anyone who reasonably can call themselves a programmer typically takes umbrage to being called a coder, and likewise to folks using the terms interchangeably. By much the same token, hackers dislike being confused with crackers just because clueless journalists and their readers/viewers don't know the difference. I suppose that could be seen as elitist, but the distinction does matter to people. And when you see someone calling themselves a "coder" but meaning they're a programmer, typically it means they're so unworthy of the proper title that they don't even know the introductory lingo. It could of course also mean they're just not that well-versed in English to pick up on a subtle difference between two words that seem alike; for most of BYOND that isn't the case though. As such, the reason I disagree is because non-native English speakers haven't been taken into consideration here. I don't see the difference between teaching them the distinction and teaching it to anyone else. Lummox JR |
In response to Android Data
|
|
Android Data wrote:
English is my second language, and I have never heard of any true distinction between "coder" and "programmer". There have been people shunning me because of it, which I do not understand. Lummox et al have basically summarized this, but here's a page you might look at for some distinction: http://www.brajeshwar.com/2007/ are-you-a-programmer-or-a-coder/ Hiead |
In response to Lummox JR
|
|
Lummox JR wrote:
"Coder" is not equivalent to "programmer" in English; it is however understandable to see how someone who does not speak it natively wouldn't know that. Then I have been lied to. I don't see the difference between teaching them the distinction and teaching it to anyone else. At least we have a valid reason for not knowing the difference, especially given that looking up the word on Google has it tell me that it's a synonym for "programmer". =P -- Data |
In response to Android Data
|
|
Android Data wrote:
Then I have been lied to. Although I'd say calling it a synonym is an error on their part, one important aspect of synonyms is that the words are never truly identical. Two words that are synonyms can share different shades of meaning while still broadly referring to the same concept. One of the unique aspects of English is its enormous vocabulary, which exists because of a wide variety of words sharing slightly overlapping meanings. I'm told that German has the second-largest vocabulary, but this is to be expected due to their related roots. Lummox JR |