In response to Danial.Beta
If the ma and pa shop is offering service and quality, I guarantee you they can stay afloat with Wal-Mart in town... because they aren't in direct competition with them... and the cheaper basic, "Official Ghetto-Ass(TM)" quality staples become, the more money the locals have to spend on quality and service, i.e., luxury goods and specialty items.

I do know what "the personal touch" looks like. Last year about this time, I had my website staff in town for a little summit where we talked about the future of our projects... and I showed them around town, which involved going to a lot of different restaurants, because quite frankly, I like to eat. :P

And at this little European style delicatessen which I'd never eaten at before, the owner came around the counter to point out particular items behind the glass from our perspective and telling us about them. There's no real tangible dollars and cents benefit to either side from him doing that... the 5% chance that we might have had to go, "Which one, this one?" and him going, "No, to the right." was averted... but it was friendly, and it was genuine. Between that kind of service and the quality of the food, that guy's not going to be threatened by MegaDeli, LTD.

But so many local businesses really don't seem to get it... like all the Ma & Pa bookstores that don't exist any more. Nowadays, the "This ain't a library... buy or get it!"-style exchange between the book store proprietor and a would-be-customer is a remnant of old sitcoms. Who in their right mind wanna go to Ma & Pa and be treated like sweaty-handed vagabonds when they can go to B&N and be treated like customers? There is still a place for indepedent book stores... but ones that genuinely offer something, not the idea of "Well, we're a local business, so we're magically better."

And yeah, Payless Shoes and Game Stop are chains... but, geez, what special individual service is an off-the-shelf shoe store going to add to make it worthwhile? Nobody ultimately wins when shopping decisions are made for reasons of pity.

And yeah, sometimes it's going to happen that a local store run by people who are actually nice and doing nothing wrong is going to be out-competed by some chain, and it's sad, but be glad to live in a country that it can happen in. What's the alternative? The first person to build a shoe store in a twenty mile radius gets "the shoe store license" and nobody else can build one? Watch your quality and service disappear then. If there is no competition, you have no incentive to be competitive.

(And I personally don't shop at Game Stop-type stores unless there's something outside Wal-Mart's selection that I need, for the simple reason that I can buy video games at Wal-Mart without being hit on.)
In response to Hedgemistress
Decent points all around, but I still say they big business does rub out small business. This isn't to say that big business is doing anything wrong, but rather that I understand the position of some of these smaller stores crying fowl.

Hedgemistress wrote:
(And I personally don't shop at Game Stop-type stores unless there's something outside Wal-Mart's selection that I need, for the simple reason that I can buy video games at Wal-Mart without being hit on.)

I can see how that might be a problem. I wish there were people in my target gender and sexual interest hitting on me at Gamestop, I might actually buy more games. I know I'd spend a lot more time there(I have actually went out with a chick working at a gamestop, now that's what I call a personal touch).
In response to Danial.Beta
but rather that I understand the position of some of these smaller stores crying fowl.

Oh, I understand it, too. I'm not exactly telling them to shut up... just as Wal-Mart and Barnes & Noble have the right to do their "unfair" business practices to try to keep themselves in business, so do the small businesses.

My rants are more intended to sway my fellow consumers into seeing how they benefit from the chains... and that if some treasured local spot that's been in business for 75 years is going under, maybe the solution is to simply support it instead of trying to block the big boxes... or examine the real reasons it's being out-competed.
In response to Hedgemistress
I'll file that under "interesting if true." :P As of this moment, you're still just some guy on the internet saying so, but my curiosity's piqued enough that I want to look into it now.

Though it seems from another post that you've already found evidence to support my "claims", and I also have no way of backing the following up, I'd still like to mention that I know these things because I'm a former Wal*Mart employee (spent about 6 years at the joint), and my mother is still a Wal*Mart employee (she got a job there when they built the store in town, and has been there ever since)

Currently, she's the associate that has been assigned to handle all of the ad comping (though the practice isn't exactly hush-hush around the store; I've known about it long before it was put on her shoulders)... Whenever a local store runs an ad, she's given a copy of it to take around the store to make the price changes, and hang up those little flags with "Save on Their Sale!" on them (yes, they actually have price flags pre-printed with that slogan on them) She has to photocopy the other store's ad, cut out the picture and price of each item to attach to the flag that shows our new, lower price...

The department managers are the ones responsible for taking the little scanner around to other stores, though... She's done that, too, being a former department manager (she stepped down due to the level of B.S. they shovel on the department managers), but it's no longer one of her duties...

As for why? It's been answered already... Wal*Mart is in the business of domination... Every opportunity to draw in another customer is taken... They are willing to even take a loss on many items just to draw people in to buy the higher-margin impulse items (though this "loss leader" practice is industry-wide, Wal*Mart makes it an art form)... If that means stealing thunder from competitors' normal and sales pricing, then so be it...

Keep in mind, though, that their primary targets aren't the small, local stores... They focus these efforts on their closest competition: K-Mart, Target, and Meijer (all three of which have stores near here) However, local grocery stores and pharmacies also get the attention of the machine (in fact, mom spends most of her time running through grocery ads)...

Also keep in mind that these price changes are almost always temporary... The ones made from competitor ads are usually timed to last just beyond the life of those ads... Just long enough to knock the wind out of their sales (heh)

[Edit:] I'd like to point out that I'm not anti-Wal*Mart... It's actually quite the opposite... I do the vast majority of my shopping there... I'm a creature of convenience, and I like taking advantage of the one-stop shopping that they truly provide... Virtually everything I ever need can be purchased right inside that one building... The low prices are only icing on the cake... I'm also fond of the "nameless, faceless" efficiency of the place (regardless of their claims to having friendly customer service)... I actually avoid friendly customer service (and I absolutely hate aggressive service, to the point where I try to avoid the smaller Mall-outlet types of stores where there's always someone right next to the door pestering you the instant you walk in)
In response to SuperSaiyanGokuX
I honestly don't care what happens to Mom and Pop stores as long as I can get stuff dirt cheap. They can rot in the streets for all I care.
In response to Hedgemistress
Without Wal-Mart I wouldn't have any clothes or food. It's the only place within 200 miles of here that has any decent deals on anything. I refuse to shop in local stores because everything is so damned expensive and it's the exact same stuff Wal-Mart has.

The town the Wal-Mart is in around here (about 30 miles away) even petitioned to have a Super Wal-Mart built because the old one was getting a bit crowded. Wal-Mart was more than happy to build a new store and not one person complained. They even sold their old building to a local hardware store, which caused said hardware store to grow into nearly Home Depot sizes. The new Wal-Mart has everything we need and we don't have to drive 100+ miles to get good prices on household items anymore. It's also caused people from all of the towns around here to start frequenting this Wal-Mart, they're estimating a 600% increase in cashflow through the county since the new store went up. Not to mention the 500+ new jobs it brought on top of the jobs the old store brought.
In response to XzDoG
SSGX works at Wal-Mart, and I have too. I've seen the associates that are charged with 'price scouting', they get like a spy-kit of tools to use for the job. Price scouting is common practice amoungst MANY businesses not just large ones, most local businesses in competition with another local business will use underhanded ways of doing it, since the employees all know eachother.
In response to Nadrew
Nadrew wrote:
SSGX works at Wal-Mart

Worked... I've been out of that hole for almost 4 years now...
In response to Revenant Jesus
I'm glad you decided to share that with us. Y'know, your views seem very contradictory. My mind might be making things up, but you seem about morals and caring and such at some point, and then at another, you just don't care about anyone but yourself.
In response to Hedgemistress
Hedgemistress wrote:
(And I personally don't shop at Game Stop-type stores unless there's something outside Wal-Mart's selection that I need, for the simple reason that I can buy video games at Wal-Mart without being hit on.)

That's the sad truth about gamers. They don't find girls anywhere else, so they hit on girls who come into gaming stores.

I tell you, the day I hit on a girl in a gaming store is the day where I jam a rusty fork up my nose, then peel off my toenails and jump into a bag of salt.

No offense specifically to gamer girls, it's just that I can do better. ;-)


[edit]You know, knowing my luck, I'm going to go into EB Games some time within the next several months and be so utterly smitten by some beautiful girl who walks into the store that I'll have to eat my foot. At least it would be nicely seasoned with salt by that point.
In response to CaptFalcon33035
CaptFalcon33035 wrote:
I'm glad you decided to share that with us. Y'know, your views seem very contradictory. My mind might be making things up, but you seem about morals and caring and such at some point, and then at another, you just don't care about anyone but yourself.

Oh no, to be honest I don't care about the convicts at all and I don't care about the illegals in our country, they could shoot them on sight and I would continue living and doing what I do without any problem at all. I just thought it was ironic how people were reacting to Americans working in America. Unless I know you personally, I don't care about you. I just posted it because I thought it was interesting conversation. I mean, don't get me wrong either, I can see others' point of view and even consider it, but my priority will always come first.
In response to Hedgemistress
Hedgemistress wrote:
Oh, but... the grocery store that was the only store in town and everybody went there because it's the only grocery store in town and they've always charged what they wanted... because it's the only grocery store in town? And the only pharmacy and the only hardware store, too? They don't want Wal-Mart to come in... because... -chuckle-... Wal-Mart is a "monopoly."

What most people refer to this as is what you pointed out: A bigger conglomerate will run a small store out because it can't compete. A smaller store can't offer the same benefits to employees or services to customers that a smaller business can. Anyone who has owned a small business will tell you this. As a result, the smaller company is put out and the larger stays. It's not the same game as two conglomerates, or two small to medium sized companies competing. It's like bringing a knife to a gun fight. The small one will be put out, the large one remains. Eventually the large one becomes the same dictator as the small one could have been.
In response to Knifo
Here's an idea, Knifo - let's make prisons a place where we destroy any and all skills that a person could use to sustain themselves after prison without resorting to crime. Additionally, let's ensure that they can't do something useful with themselves and hopefully get above the poverty line while they're in there.

The primary causes of crime are sociological. If prisons don't address this, then you get more crime. It's a very simple idea.
In response to SSJ2GohanDBGT
Except in a country the size of America, no store ever fully dominates across the board... which means that if they start jacking their prices up in areas where they have dominated, another company could move into that area, forcing them to lower them again. The threat of such is what keeps them from doing so.

It's impossible for a company to gradually grow a nationwide monopoly, because while they crush territory X, territory Y is being invaded and territory Z is just now growing to the size it can support a big store. On the other hand, if Wal-Mart were to suddenly merge with a bunch of the other national chains, then we'd be in monopoly territory... but that's where government regulators have their place.

Anyone who has owned a small business will tell you this.

Anyone who used to own a small business will tell me this. :P Meanwhile, I can walk up and down my primary shopping corridor here in town and point out the small, independent businesses nestled among the big chains (Wal-Mart and Super Target a half mile away from each other... shudder!). The stores which are trying to compete with the big stores are the ones whose business model basically consisted of "own the only [whichver type of] store in town"... sad for the owners when they go under, but not much of a loss. The ones who are offering something more, or find a way to offer service that the big stores can't, flourish with the lift provided by the big stores.
this is like the BYOND site changes. Everyone sees it differently and has different opinions. The government made this decision and probably arn't going to change their minds. If you don't like it then u send in a Bill or something.

To Do something like this the government had to have put in alot of thought, and debate. They cant one day say - "hey my cousin is in jail, lets try and make jail happier now!"

Trust the experts cause they no wat they r doing
In response to SuperSaiyanGokuX
Hey, it's nothing personal to you that I was skeptical... I am skeptical by nature, and the internet is full of "true facts" about any large corporation that "I know is true because I used to work there." Yeah, you're not "just some guy on the internet" in the sense that I know you, after a fashion... but I work alongside an otherwise intelligent woman I've known for two years who swears the Texas Chainsaw Massacre really did happen because she paid $10 to tour the house where it happened.* From your original post, your "inside information" could have been anything from having seen a "top secret memo" to just having a cousin who worked there and swore it was true.

Though as my other post said, my debunking reflex was really triggered by how the information was presented to me (by the above post, not by you)... in retrospect, it's kind of a silly thing to doubt, as the eternal price war is an entrenched feature of the industry.

*(Though every story has a grain of truth to it, and hers is probably the part where she paid $10. I've got no doubt there's a house... probably a few of them... whose owners make money based on that claim.)
In response to Devin148

Yeah and you with your wonderful spelling and knowledge on all things legal would be the best expert to consult on such a thing right? What are you trying to say to me? I never agreed or disagreed with it, I was simply sharing it with the community, so honestly I don't know what the hell you are talking about right now.



The Government? Wait, where do you read that? There wasn't some sort of bill passed for this, this is something the prison system decided to try on it's own. Not everything they do has to be dictated by the government. They [the government] know what they are doing? No, obviously they don't because they spend half their time and our money fighting one another and arguing about senseless things. These experts as you so call them are nothing more then adults with a raging case of PMS.

In response to Hedgemistress
I was told that the Texas Chainsaw Massacre was based off the murders of Ed Gein, because he also would dig up bodies and wear the skins and stuff. Honestly I wish movies weren't allowed to put that "Based on True Event" crap on their films anymore.
In response to Revenant Jesus
That's the official story behind how they can put "based on a true story" on it... though the creator's since admitted the -passing- similarity to Ed Gein was only noticed after they were already making the movie. The idea really came from seeing a big heavy duty chain saw on display in a hardware store and going "Wouldn't it be awesome if there was a movie..."
In response to Hedgemistress
There already was, Evil Dead II, or wait, was that before or after TCM? It has been such a long time I can't remember.
Page: 1 2 3 4