ID:276130
 
Is there anyway to change background color using < > tags?
<font bgcolor = black>
I'm not sure if its the same with CSS.
http://www.members.byond.com/ITGMaster

Edit your Defualt CSS script thing.
Digital Samurai wrote:
Is there anyway to change background color using < > tags?

Yod dont use < > in css, you use hte { }

body {
background-color: whatever
}
In response to Infernal dragon
I was editing the HTML of my BYOND site, and I kept trying to use {}, but it didn't have a source, so I could'nt, but I fixed it.

But does anyone know how you make your title a png like
http://members.byond.com/DigitalSamurai I did it, but I had to edit the whole page is there any other way to do it?
In response to Digital Samurai
Digital Samurai wrote:
But does anyone know how you make your title a png like
http://members.byond.com/DigitalSamurai I did it, but I had to edit the whole page is there any other way to do it?

I'm not really quite sure what you're asking, but it sounds like you want a picture as your page background. In that case, use background-image:

body {
background-image: url("http://my-image.com");
}
In response to Wizkidd0123
And if you want to repeat it, then
background-image: url(bannerbg.gif);
background-repeat: repeat-x /*and or*/ repeat-y;
In response to Smoko
But url() is supposed to have quotes, so more like this =P:

background-image: url("http://my-image.com/image.png");
background-repeat: repeat-x /*and or*/ repeat-y;
In response to Wizkidd0123
It still works without the quotes, it's just unvalid.

Not that it matters, the whole BYOND site is unvalid anyway >_<

see?
In response to Wizkidd0123
No, it got deleted, or something, but I had the title of my page as a png. Like right now it's just regular text that says Digital Samurai's Thoughts. Well I made a png to replace that, and I got the title to change to the png, but it somehow got deleted, and it seems I can't do it again.
In response to Smoko
Depressingly, every single site that I visit on a regular basis is invalid as defined by the W3C.

EVERY SINGLE ONE. =P

Not just BYOND; but all phpbb forums, the Thief 3 forums I visit, even Google!!!

It's not like it's hard to fix a page based on the W3C's validation results. =\
In response to Crispy
Crispy wrote:
Depressingly, every single site that I visit on a regular basis is invalid as defined by the W3C.

EVERY SINGLE ONE. =P

Not just BYOND; but all phpbb forums, the Thief 3 forums I visit, even Google!!!

It's not like it's hard to fix a page based on the W3C's validation results. =\

I wonder...has anyone ever tried checking W3C's own website for validation? >_>
In response to Teh Governator
I just did, and it passes. =)

It'd be embarassing if it didn't. =D
In response to Crispy
Crispy wrote:
I just did, and it passes. =)

It'd be embarassing if it didn't. =D

Now did it pass because it's valid, or did it pass because the validator specificly checks if it's trying to validate w3.org? >.>
In response to Teh Governator
Crispy wrote:
Depressingly, every single site that I visit on a regular basis is invalid as defined by the W3C.

EVERY SINGLE ONE. =P

Not just BYOND; but all phpbb forums, the Thief 3 forums I visit, even Google!!!

It's not like it's hard to fix a page based on the W3C's validation results. =\

The majority of sites I goto are valid, but thats cause the people I "hang out" with on the internet are validation whores :P. PunBB is a valid forum system, and its speedy too ^_^.
In response to Jon88
Jon88 wrote:
Now did it pass because it's valid, or did it pass because the validator specificly checks if it's trying to validate w3.org? >.>

Valid with http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/ and by checking manually :P