A while back volte did somthing with VB and TrueVision3D.
http://developer.byond.com/forum/ index.cgi?action=message_read&id=224286&forum=4&view=1
I downloaded TrueVision3d and it can be used with VB, VS.NET, VC++, Delphi. I have the Dev-C++ compiler but when I tried too load the .dsp that MSVC++ makes. I could not import 6.0 VC++ project files. Then when I just made a new project and added the Tutorial cpp and header files and added the library I was suppose to. It still forze cause to many errors and warnings were displayed. At least that is what I got when I pressed canel after waiting for it too compile for like 10 minutes.
Any info on TrueVision3d and how I can get it too work with Dev-C++ compiler. Or maybe another language that has a compiler that is compatable with it?
P.S. Microsoft I hate you for not giving a VB compiler for free.
ID:276013
Mar 31 2005, 10:10 am
|
|
In response to Theodis
|
|
Theodis wrote:
P.S. Microsoft I hate you for not giving a VB compiler for free. More info on this VB.NET would be good. I never heard of it before O.o. Oh and is it compatable with TrueVision3D? Is it as easy too learn as VB? |
In response to Green Lime
|
|
After VB 6, Microsoft went nuts and changed everything about VB and re-released it as VB .NET
.NET is Microsoft's fragile stab at Java :( ~Kujila |
Visual C++ project files are Microsoft-specific. Nothing else besides VC++ can read them, so don't expect that Dev-C++ will. =) IIRC, Dev-C++ has a limited "import" feature for them, but I don't think that works too well.
Getting other people's C/C++ code to compile (especially on other compilers than they used) can be tricky if you don't have any experience with C/C++. Especially seeing as VC++ supports some extended syntax that Dev-C++ doesn't. Using VB would be an easier option, if you can get a copy. |
In response to Green Lime
|
|
More info on this VB.NET would be good. I never heard of it before O.o. VB.NET is the latest version of VB than uses the CLI(Commmon Language Infrastructure) like C#. It is the first version of VB that is actually objected oriented and it has changed a lot since its earlier versions. It's pretty much C# with VBs awful syntax and for some reason is still slower than C#. My suggestion is just to stay away from it and learn C# :P. Oh and is it compatable with TrueVision3D? I haven't used TrueVision3D so I wouldn't know but I hear managed Direct X is pretty easy to use which is compatible with VB.NET. Is it as easy too learn as VB? It is mostly VB so yeah it is as easy :P. |
In response to Theodis
|
|
Theodis wrote:
P.S. Microsoft I hate you for not giving a VB compiler for free. I didn't shell out any cash for mine. >.> Anyways, there are probably some open source IDEs out there that will work fine as a substitute for VS.NET. |
In response to Jon88
|
|
I didn't shell out any cash for mine. >.> Err yeah I meant for Microsoft's one. Anyways, there are probably some open source IDEs out there that will work fine as a substitute for VS.NET. Yeah SharpDevelop looks kinda cool but I still like my VS.NET :P. |
In response to Theodis
|
|
Theodis wrote:
I didn't shell out any cash for mine. >.> So did I. >.> <.< Sorry for not phrasing it clearly. |
In response to Jon88
|
|
Jon88 wrote:
Theodis wrote: Did you win it as a prize? A gift O.o? Or did you sneek into microsoft headquarters and steal it O.o |
In response to Green Lime
|
|
Green Lime wrote:
Jon88 wrote: I like the MSDNAA and similar academic agreements. |
In response to Green Lime
|
|
Green Lime wrote:
Did you win it as a prize? A gift O.o? Downloaded it? Got it pre installed on a computer that you bought? |
The compiler for VB.NET is free and comes with the .NET framwork :P. You just don't get any pretty IDE without shelling out cash.