Allow the clients to disable the BYOND banners which appear on the screen for no appearant reason?
It'd be handy sometimes. At some points I accidentally click a banner while I didn't want to click one. A feature to disable the banner would be handy.
ID:259878
Jan 2 2005, 12:00 am
|
|
Jan 2 2005, 7:48 am
|
|
The banner is going to be moved to the stand alone pager in either 3.5 or 4.0, but I don't think it will ever be completely removed.
|
In response to Shadowdarke
|
|
How do you know these things??? j/w
|
In response to Necro Night
|
|
If you hang around on the forums, or even run a search, you'd see most of these statements as they are made by Mike H and Tom (possibly Lummox JR).
Plus, I believe ShadowDarke hosts many of the Staff meetings in Darke Dungeon, and hangs out in the Athenaeum. |
In response to Ter13
|
|
He is also a moderator on the forum and I think a hub reviewer so he is in the Know with stuff like this.
|
In response to N1ghtW1ng
|
|
I'm not a hub reviewer, but the rest is true. I don't host meetings in Darke Dungeon anymore though. Lummox gets very distracted in Darke Dungeon. I just open a BTG room if Guy isn't around to host.
|
In response to Shadowdarke
|
|
Shadowdarke wrote:
I'm not a hub reviewer, but the rest is true. I don't host meetings in Darke Dungeon anymore though. Lummox gets very distracted in Darke Dungeon. I just open a BTG room if Guy isn't around to host. BTG? |
In response to Wizkidd0123
|
|
Wizkidd0123 wrote:
BTG? BYOND Tabletop Gaming, one of my programs. It was originally designed for playing pen and paper RPGs online, but it is a nice chatroom with useful security and it makes it easy to share data through storybox sheets. |
In response to Shadowdarke
|
|
Shadowdarke wrote:
Lummox gets very distracted in Darke Dungeon. Can't help but giggle at that. |
In response to Foomer
|
|
Foomer wrote:
Shadowdarke wrote: Eeeewwww... |
In response to Shadowdarke
|
|
You know, Chatters has all the features you could want, not to mention invitation-only channels and invisibilty settings. Really, I don't know why you'd use anything else. It would be quite easy to secure an invisible channel that's invitation-only access. Not to mention the nifty features, like showcode and showtext. :P
~X |
In response to Xooxer
|
|
You forgot "shameless plug" tags, Xoox.
|