I was wondering why Women always 'claim' to want to be equal as Men. But Then, I was watching the Army Boot Camp thing, and Women had to do about 1/2 of the work the Men did. I don't see them complianing about that. I could be busting my ass doing all that crap, but they will be finished before I do. I don't see them complian about that...
Also, in "most" Locker Rooms, Women have curtians to shower in. But Men shower in the open? I don't seem them complianing about THAT either.
So, I guess they want to be equal in certian things, but not others?
Just a thought, nothing offense meant by it.
-ST
PS - Yes, I know this is going to be a big ass thread :P
ID:191855
 Aug 6 2002, 3:23 pm
|
|
Well I'm sure by equality then mean equal opportunity.
| |
You see, it's simple.it's actually like the equality between races. did you know that there is a black college fund, and a black history month. but no white ones. cuz if it were a white one, automatically it's kkk. what, why do people think that white people have no history, and why do people think that there is no "american", and that they just are from all over. that's wrong, americans are white calvinists from england, but due to the fact that america is a new country, many races have integrated into it. people say that americans origonate from all over, but that's just cuz america is a new country. think about it, french people origonated from the same place all humans did, but just because they had their own country for thousands of years, they began to look similar, thus they are french. sorry, that was off the subject. Women want equality, but they simply can't do the things that males can. No sexist, but that's just the way it is. Because they had no rights to do crap for thousands of years, due to their low strength, males ruled the world. they can never become as strong as males (as a whole), and they will never do things that males do (i.e. pro football, president of usa). it just wont' happen. they always have women power and that shiz, but you don't see people getting mad at them. if males say male power, and have a male channel, they get sued and all sorts of shiz. i dunno, that's just my opinion.
| |
Your very correct, expect for one thing, Hillary Clinton will most likely be running for president next election, and she might damn well win. (doom on us all)
| |
$$$$ that! i want a millitary leader who has the balls to kill sadaam, and kill those palastinian terrorists in asia. hillary clinton, yeah right. i bet you that there will never be a women, or black presedent ever.
| |
No offense but your either very naive or just stupid. People dont like bush, and he was one of the few rebublican presidents we have had in a long time besides his father. If Hillary clinton DOES run for president it will most likely be for the democraitc party, and women will vote for her, becuase women vote for who they like, not for who they think would be the best president. As do black people (no offense intended). If you think this will never happen you are dead wrong.
| |
I don't believe in "equality"...
I believe in "equivalency"... There's a difference... A woman can't necessarily do everything a man can... But that doesn't make us better than the ladies...because they can do things that we are incapable of... We're made differently inside and out... So there's no way we can be "equals"... But we're all worth the same... | |
becuase women vote for who they like, not for who they think would be the best president. As do black people (no offense intended). And so do white males. So does everyone. Everyone votes for the candidate they like better. If you think someone would make the best president, why wouldn't you like them better than their opponent? | |
If men want curtains in their showers, they should ask for them.
Yes, the average woman is not as strong, physically, as the average man. I don't know any statistics, but it's possible that the average woman is incapable of regularly meeting the minimum requirements for men in the army. So, let's not let women in the army. Um... excuse me, but is there any army in the world that has so many volunteers it can afford to turn 51% of the population away at the door? I really don't think so. The differing requirements are simply a bow in the direction of reality. Two realities, actually. One, the army can't afford to turn away most of its female applicants, and two, if they forced them to conform to physical standards based on male physiology, they would have to. Let me ask you this... does our political system revolve around strength? Does someone who can bench 350 lbs. get to cast twice as many votes as someone who can bench 175 lbs.? If not, then what does the fact that men tend to be stronger than women have to do with equality? If we're going to start comparing biology, I'm not pulling any punches. How about the fact that we, not men, have higher thresholds of pain? A more stable center of gravity? More acute senses of smell and hearing? Less offensive body odor? Some studies have indicated that the hemispheres of our brains are more closely integrated than yours. We go through hormonal shifts on a (mostly) regular cycle. You guys go through them almost constantly, at erratic intervals, multiple times a day. Then, there's that tiny little matter of child birth. From my perspective, you're all very lucky that we're willing to settle for equality. | |
Lesbian Assassin wrote:
[snip] From my perspective, you're all very lucky that we're willing to settle for equality. ...Oh, that's why such ridiculous arguments continue. :( | |
From my perspective, you're all very lucky that we're willing to settle for equality. This is where we require physical strength to lift up heavy guns and stop revolts against us. Of course theres always that one idiots policy on not hitting a girl, but thats where womens "equality" pops up. Also women only have good center of balances because they need it for standing with a 7lb human in their body(which from what I heard is very hard, so kudos goes out to moms), this goes the same with pain resistance, I'm pretty sure you need it when your shooting out a human being from inside you. Women also lose the ability to reproduce after their about 50 or so, men can keep it up till they are 70, this makes me surprised that there never were any laws in the medieval times that once you can't reproduce your slaughtered, then again they never did live that long back then. Also, the fact about women being more intelligent then men is true, but men are better at compiling about whats going on faster. <<>>Kusanagi<<>> | |
Jotdaniel wrote:
Your very correct, expect for one thing, Hillary Clinton will most likely be running for president next election, and she might damn well win. (doom on us all) Personally, I'd like to see Condoleezza Rice replace Cheney as Bush's running mate in the 2004 election. | |
I'm one of those "never hit a girl" types...
However, if being attacked by one, I see no problem in restraining one to keep her from hitting me...lol | |
You say that but when it happens =/ it's totally different. I once accidentally ran over a 15(14 - 16 most likely) year old girls purse with my bike, it slipped from her hands as I passed by. She was like **** you, you little **** eater. I stopped my bike and looked back, she was up to me before I knew it about to scratch my face, in a split seconds notice I responded with a punch to her stomach and road off. She was majorly umm round(How could she of moved so fast?) so I was gonna throw a pun in there as I drove off but it's just not my style, I was sorta thinking of, "Hope that didn't hurt your baby!".
<<>>Kusanagi<<>> | |
(And yes this is going to be a very long thread, but I agree with you wholly.)