Inego Montoya is a character from a movie... what is it with you and "historical significance?" It's like you know you can't put forth a valid argument, so instead you attack things that other people aren't actually saying (like how no one here said they were offended by the word gay, but you kept acting like that's what we were saying) or you make up things that make no sense, like this historical significance thing.
Funnily enough, I did mention historical significance in the anarchy thread, but you didn't even notice. You never notice what people are actually saying.
Anyway, I'm dropping this... and I'm dropping my objections to having you and anyone who acts like you banned. I don't have time for this, the forum doesn't have space for this, but no way am I going to see you given a free hand.
Mountain Dew wrote:
was i ever agreeing with lesbian assassin? Because, GreenDice, this isn't the first time you've posted on one of your own threads at the absolute most opportune time to try to talk yourself up or deflect heat from yourself. I was actually thinking until you posted that, in spite of people saying VyseDyne (you) was probably GreenDice (you), that the fact that Mountain Dew (you) hadn't yet posted on the thread spoke against that. But I'd also said I wouldn't be terribly surprised if in fact such a connection was proven. Lummox JR | |
maybe cause your brown nosing self and lesbo are the only whos who care so lets drop this im not appologising but im also not gonna fight with a brown noser
| |
VyseDyne wrote:
yeah actually it does since i havent agreed to any rules and why dont you stop policing the forums and go enjoy the fruits of life Just saying you didn't sign anything doesn't mean you don't imply agreement. Forums like this one operate with rules or at least guidelines, with the understanding that if you cause a great deal of trouble, you'll be tossed out, no matter what you did or didn't explicitly agree to. You are Dantom's guest on these forums. Therefore, you have a responsibility to show respect for your hosts and for your fellow guests. No amount of legalese will allow you to weasel out of that obligation, any more than changing your name 4 times makes you someone other than GreenDice. Lummox JR | |
You don't have to agree to rules for them to be valid... if there's no official terms and conditions, that means the owner doesn't have any formal rules, which means you're basically at the owner's mercy. It means the owner doesn't need to explain his or her self for any action they take.
Not that Dantom operates this way... they just prefer a hands off approach. I'm just pointing out that the fact that you didn't agree to any rules means nothing. | |
Mountain Dew wrote:
hey man, dont swear...we know what swearing does to people (u-thing, raekwon) How telling that you brought up U-god, and used my own epithet for him. I'll file that under the burgeoning "Evidence we didn't need that proves the obvious" file. Lummox JR | |
VyseDyne wrote:
maybe cause your brown nosing self and lesbo are the only whos who care so lets drop this im not appologising but im also not gonna fight with a brown noser If you really care to drop the matter, then why are you throwing parting insults? I would've been justified in tossing out several of my own by now. I suggest you take Lexy up on her ultimatum for an apology, assuming Dantom even let you get that far. I for one will take up arguing the case for not giving you the chance. Lummox JR | |
VyseDyne wrote:
maybe cause your brown nosing self and lesbo are the only whos who care Not true. I'm usually quiet about such matters and ignore most of your antics, but that in no way means I approve of them. You are a waste of forum space. I've yet to see anyone stand up for you that convincingly acts like a separate person. Maybe you should spend more time making real friends than you do making up imaginary forum friends. | |
I have learned in the past to know when Les is laffing about things on her posts, and this was to me, one of the more obvious ones.
| |
EVERY F*CKING TOPIC TUNRS OUT THIS WAY SO LETS JUST DROP THE SERIOUS CRAP, AND LAFF ABOUT WHAT WE GOT ON THE GAY'O METER!
| |
I am %20. And when I tried to make it say %100 and I got a %70.I think its safe to say its not at all accurate.
-Rcet | |
You can be gay or straight, if you have sex with men you are gay, you cant be super gay, or not so much gay, you can only be gay, but you can have different levels of sex, soft core, semi-core and hardcore.
| |
Lesbian Assassin wrote:
For the record, the quiz does offend me, but not because I'm offended by the word "gay." Not that I'm defending this twerp, but when my final results listed me as "33% gay", I was told "You need to loosen up a little bit with your sexuality, straight boy." Why should that matter? Because it shows that the stereotypes you're accusing the quiz of perpetrating go both ways (Joe Hetero is uptight. All straight guys MUST be football fans. All straight guys SHOULDN'T care about their personal appearance.) Quite frankly, I think the whole quiz falls under the category of "satire"... by coming up with something as luducris as a "homosexuality test", the creators are forcing people to think about the blanket statements they make on a daily basis, ie: "He likes show-tunes and Judy Garland... he must be gay." See? That right there was the mental equivalent of the homosexuality test, without all the HTML hoopla. So to get offended by this quiz when it's really cheering on "your side", and the idiocy you face on a daily basis (cough VyseDyne cough) is, in my opinion, to act a little over-sensitive. Regards, Corporate Dog PS: In other posts, I saw you say that you weren't offended by the quiz itself. Color me confused. | |
i called him that, because i couldnt remember the god part...sorry my memory is not that great, and how does saying something you claim to have thought of show how i am some kind of person?
i was imitating what you say...imitation is the highest form of flattery you know | |
You mentioned the "historical significance" thing before, and it made no more sense then than it does now. You sure seem to have missed the point of what I said about your random gibberish tangents. But then, Green, we've come to expect that.
Lummox JR